Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2019, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,799,455 times
Reputation: 7168

Advertisements

None of the ones I know that won the Best Picture Oscar recently sound appealing to me. And I wouldn’t be surprised if they lost money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2019, 12:35 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,484,437 times
Reputation: 59601
"Worth watching" is quite relative. I can't determine that for you.

Of the films in the 2010s, I really enjoyed The Kings Speech, 12 Years a Slave, Spotlight, and The Shape of Water. I thought Argo, Birdman, and Greenbook were okay. Didn't care for The Artist or Moonlight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,799,455 times
Reputation: 7168
A long time ago, Best Picture winners tended to be crowdpleasers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 12:55 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,484,437 times
Reputation: 59601
If that were the criteria, we'd have a bunch of crappy superhero movies as Best Picture. No thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Fort Payne Alabama
2,558 posts, read 2,899,953 times
Reputation: 5014
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
If that were the criteria, we'd have a bunch of crappy superhero movies as Best Picture. No thanks.

No offense but what would be wrong with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 01:18 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,484,437 times
Reputation: 59601
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreggT View Post
No offense but what would be wrong with that?
Time and time again, we've seen that just because a movie is popular, that doesn't mean it's a good movie. Typically it just means more marketing $$$ and hype.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,799,455 times
Reputation: 7168
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Time and time again, we've seen that just because a movie is popular, that doesn't mean it's a good movie. Typically it just means more marketing $$$ and hype.
There’s also plenty of money and hype in the horserace for Best Picture.
I think “Silence” should have won, but it wasn’t nominated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
29,737 posts, read 34,357,220 times
Reputation: 77029
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Time and time again, we've seen that just because a movie is popular, that doesn't mean it's a good movie. Typically it just means more marketing $$$ and hype.
And in the best case scenario, a Best Picture winner would be a great example of direction, acting, sound, script, cinematography, costumes, etc. Superhero movies have great special effects, but everything else is negotiable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 01:41 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,484,437 times
Reputation: 59601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy Old Schmo View Post
There’s also plenty of money and hype in the horserace for Best Picture.
Within the microcosm of the Academy voting members perhaps. But it's not the same level of money and hype that goes into "popular" films.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2019, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,555 posts, read 10,603,886 times
Reputation: 36567
Agreed, "worth watching" is highly subjective. I can answer only for myself, and as I see it, the movies that are worth watching must be, first and foremost, ones that I actually watched. In other words, if I didn't watch a movie, I must have decided that it wasn't worth watching.

The last Best Picture movie that I watched was the 2004 winner Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Before that, it was the 1998 winner Titanic. And before that, it was the 1995 winner Forrest Gump. Put simply, there simply aren't all that many films that the Motion Picture Academy and I agree are the "best."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top