Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2009, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Boca Raton, FL
6,883 posts, read 11,237,132 times
Reputation: 10807

Advertisements

I loved George Clooney in Michael Clayton and some others but this movie which got 3 1/2 stars (out of 4) in my area just seemed stupid. I saw people walk out also. My son, age 20, also saw it and thought the same.

Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2009, 12:05 AM
 
3,804 posts, read 9,318,493 times
Reputation: 4978
I think it was missing something. I kept trying to figure out what it was. The absurdity of the training, and Clooney's character's earnest belief, was mis-played, I think. It was allllmost funny. Kevin Spacey's character came out of nowhere and just took over the narrative to the point that it seemed like a rushed ending.

Tragic that it came out the day after the Fort Hood event. I bet they would like to have reworked those two scenes. Very jarring.

It looked like the work of a first time director, and the editing killed a lot of the comedy, i think. The timing throughout was way off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 03:16 AM
 
Location: Oxford, England
13,026 posts, read 24,619,938 times
Reputation: 20165
I really enjoyed it and found it very funny. I thought it was very deadpan , very British in a way. It was not a great movie by any stretch of the imagination but there were some sparks of brilliance to it.

I also thought the film was structured more like proper "story-telling" rather a straight script and was quite original especially having come out of Hollywood. I found it quite charming and disarming.



I guess humour is a very personal thing... I can't remember the last time I laughed at a Hollywood comedy so this was quite refreshing for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 11:38 PM
 
126 posts, read 260,640 times
Reputation: 166
I'm sorry, the NAME is patently stupid. That tells me right there the movie will be an abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2009, 12:10 AM
 
2,245 posts, read 4,230,661 times
Reputation: 2155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bette View Post
I loved George Clooney in Michael Clayton and some others but this movie which got 3 1/2 stars (out of 4) in my area just seemed stupid. I saw people walk out also. My son, age 20, also saw it and thought the same.

Am I missing something?
What were you expecting? Did you honestly think from the film's promotional clips that it would be humorous?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2009, 03:33 PM
 
8,228 posts, read 14,211,900 times
Reputation: 11233
Its not that I was ever the best military bearing or my uniform had the best crease but it still irritates me to see Hollywood movies that barely even try - hair all long, mustaches half way to their ears, sideburns all long. Haven't seen the movie and might enjoy it somewhat taking it for what it is, but the trailers where irritating for the way some of them looked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2009, 03:27 AM
 
Location: Oxford, England
13,026 posts, read 24,619,938 times
Reputation: 20165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giesela View Post
Its not that I was ever the best military bearing or my uniform had the best crease but it still irritates me to see Hollywood movies that barely even try - hair all long, mustaches half way to their ears, sideburns all long. Haven't seen the movie and might enjoy it somewhat taking it for what it is, but the trailers where irritating for the way some of them looked.

If you see the movie you will understand the "why" of the "Hippie" bearing of that particular unit. It's part of the plot not some Hollywood aberration of the wardrobe mistress !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2010, 08:48 PM
 
Location: MO Ozarkian in NE Hoosierana
4,682 posts, read 12,055,024 times
Reputation: 6992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooseketeer View Post
I really enjoyed it and found it very funny. I thought it was very deadpan , very British in a way. It was not a great movie by any stretch of the imagination but there were some sparks of brilliance to it.

I also thought the film was structured more like proper "story-telling" rather a straight script and was quite original especially having come out of Hollywood. I found it quite charming and disarming.

I guess humour is a very personal thing... I can't remember the last time I laughed at a Hollywood comedy so this was quite refreshing for me.
Just saw and lol'd at and with this movie... found it entertaining, funny, intelligent, and enjoyable. Only negative - just seemed a bit short. The acting / characters were great, as was the script and locations. As Mooseketeer implies, its all in the eye of the beholder. Me and mine, rated this as a 8 out of 10. One important aspect of this movie that might be important to recognize - this is NOT a comedy per se... but a film with humor, telling a story, as a documentary, a quirky dark-humor documentary; where goofy line is "Silence of the Goats" is stated

ps: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/157...cm_cr_asin_lnk for those interested...

Last edited by ShadowCaver; 05-18-2010 at 09:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2010, 08:54 PM
 
4,796 posts, read 22,899,264 times
Reputation: 5047
I thought it was stupid. Similarly stupid as The Darjeeling Limited and The Life Acquatic and Running with Scissors. I have a very dry sense of humor but these take it to a whole new level. Its like the lack of humor in the movie is what is supposed to be funny. Instead I just find them dumb.

Fortunately I've learned my lesson and I don't pay to see these (a roommate had rented Men Who Stare at Goats).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2010, 03:17 AM
 
Location: Anchorage
4,061 posts, read 9,880,776 times
Reputation: 2351
Quote:
Originally Posted by kodaka View Post
I thought it was stupid. Similarly stupid as The Darjeeling Limited and The Life Acquatic and Running with Scissors. I have a very dry sense of humor but these take it to a whole new level. Its like the lack of humor in the movie is what is supposed to be funny. Instead I just find them dumb.

Fortunately I've learned my lesson and I don't pay to see these (a roommate had rented Men Who Stare at Goats).
I thought The Life Aquatic was wonderful, but oddly I think you have to watch it more than once to get the full effect. It was very carefully crafted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top