Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If I love trekking, wild terrain, oceans, rivers, anything away from the fake ego and pride of man, which city would you recommend?
Perhaps Vancouver or Vancouver Island? What about San Francisco.
Look a little north of Vancouver. Depending on your definition of "wild terrain" you may be satisfied with Kamloops. If not there, you might prefer Prince George, a tad further north.
And if that ain't wild enough, wander a bit northeast and check out Prince Rupert.
None of the above would be a bad choice. BC is a lovely province with just about everything to offer the nature lover.
(I could work for their tourism board. And I was only there for a couple of months!)
You might want to try a smaller city, one that won't take hours to get out of (and the surrounding suburbs).
Exactly. Seattle, Phoenix, San Francisco, and Denver are great examples of large urban areas that have terrific natural areas that are relatively close but that require longish drives through suburban sprawl to get to.
Spokane, Washington. Medium sized city surrounded by beautiful country. Seattle is 5 hours to the west but Idaho and British Columbia and all of the mountains, water and breathtaking scenery and adventure are right outside the city.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.