Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2014, 08:34 PM
 
734 posts, read 1,630,620 times
Reputation: 907

Advertisements

New York State Department of Conservation intends to kill/remove all mute swans by 2025. Please sign the petition opposing this horrible slaughter.

Mod cut: Link removed. Soliciting in the threads is not permitted, and that includes petitions. Sorry about that, folks. You may post links to articles about this topic.

Last edited by PJSaturn; 02-06-2014 at 12:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:30 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
36,972 posts, read 40,972,123 times
Reputation: 44901
NY eyes plan to shoot, sterilize invasive mute swans along Lake Ontario, elsewhere | syracuse.com

It sounds as if there are legitimate reasons to reduce the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,155 posts, read 26,072,600 times
Reputation: 27887
I guess a choice needs to be made between leaving them alone to decimate other species or control them.
Native specie usually have accompanying natural controls.
They have no effective natural predator and reproduce abundantly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 07:36 AM
 
734 posts, read 1,630,620 times
Reputation: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
I guess a choice needs to be made between leaving them alone to decimate other species or control them.
Native specie usually have accompanying natural controls.
They have no effective natural predator and reproduce abundantly.


The swans have been here since the 1800's. I haven't heard of any species becoming endangered due to them. There are only 2500 of them in NY so what is the problem? The DEC stands for Destroy Every Creature. I have had some serious issues with them in the past. Instead than conserving nature, they cater to hunters and manipulate, not control, the animal population.
There is no valid reason to kill the swans and don't for a minute entertain the thought that they will "remove" them. Nope, kill is what they are all about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 07:38 AM
 
734 posts, read 1,630,620 times
Reputation: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
NY eyes plan to shoot, sterilize invasive mute swans along Lake Ontario, elsewhere | syracuse.com

It sounds as if there are legitimate reasons to reduce the population.
"Reduce"? Where does the DEC say reduce? They plan to kill ALL the swans in NY. A population of 2500 is certainly not a lot for the entire region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
36,972 posts, read 40,972,123 times
Reputation: 44901
Quote:
Originally Posted by J5K5LY View Post
"Reduce"? Where does the DEC say reduce? They plan to kill ALL the swans in NY. A population of 2500 is certainly not a lot for the entire region.
How long does it take for 2500 to become 25000?

Other states also have a problem:

http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlif...ement-plan.pdf

"Mute swans compete with native wildlife for limited food and habitat resources. They are large birds that consume substantial amounts of wetland and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV). Mute swans can negatively impact SAV beds and restoration plantings, especially during the summer growing season, by uprooting plants and denuding areas of vegetation. This reduces the availability and abundance of SAV for wintering waterfowl and other fish and wildlife populations dependent upon this habitat. Reductions in SAV growth also negatively affect water quality and other ecosystem functions.
Mute swans can be very aggressive and intimidating, often exhibiting antagonistic behavior toward other wildlife species. They can prevent native waterfowl from using traditional nesting and feeding habitats. They have displaced colonial nesting birds and native shorebirds from traditional nesting and roosting areas, and in some cases, mute swans have killed other wetland bird species. Their aggressive behavior has also been directed at other animals, pets and at people. Some human/swan conflicts have been severe enough to prevent people from using shoreline property and adjacent waters. Compounding these concerns is the fact that mute swans are non-migratory and therefore have impacts on these resources throughout the entire year."


It's not just a matter of deciding to kill a few pretty birds for the sake of killing them. If the population is unchecked, the swans can reduce the populations of other bird species. Which is worse: Kill the swans or let the swans threaten multiple other species?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:06 PM
 
17,876 posts, read 15,769,526 times
Reputation: 11655
just keep them around, and issue hunting licenses for a fee. This way the state makes money, keeps population in check, and we get to keep some wildlife around
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:20 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
14,785 posts, read 23,976,028 times
Reputation: 27091
everything has a right to life even if they are mute ....OMG to the rest of you who said it is okay with you if they cull them OMG get a heart or better yet get some blood running in your veins and not ice water ...we humans are horrible to other creatures who live on this earth with us .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
36,972 posts, read 40,972,123 times
Reputation: 44901
Quote:
Originally Posted by phonelady61 View Post
everything has a right to life even if they are mute ....OMG to the rest of you who said it is okay with you if they cull them OMG get a heart or better yet get some blood running in your veins and not ice water ...we humans are horrible to other creatures who live on this earth with us .
When we take an animal out of its natural habitat and it ruins its new habitat for the animals that were already there, which animal should have priority?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:02 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
13,912 posts, read 39,124,980 times
Reputation: 10237
Look at wild pigs! they not native look how they are destroying forest & other areas for native animals! Yes these birds need to be removed! While they at it get rid of those Stink Bugs too!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top