U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
Old 01-07-2018, 01:57 PM
Location: the heart is!
4,635 posts, read 4,023,803 times
Reputation: 10120


Originally Posted by grega94 View Post

why doesn't the lumber industry plant redwoods?
I'm certainly no expert in the industry but I have to believe that corporate greed, environmental activists and the U.S. courts became like-minded concerning deforestation and the huge impact on the environment in a multitude of ways. The various 'insiders' in these 'deals' would be in-the-know better than the common citizen.

U.S. Pacific Lumber make deal on redwoods Saturday, February 28, 1998

Under the plan, Pacific Lumber couldn't log for the next 50 years in 12 of the 13 groves important for the survival of the marbled murrelet, a little seabird. The groves lie outside the boundaries of the 7,500 acres the government wants to purchase.

U.S., Pacific Lumber make deal on redwoods - SFGate

10 Years later...

Fate of Pacific Lumber, Redwoods, in Judge’s Hands
By Cari Tuna
The Wall Street Journal
June 6, 2008

Pacific Lumber has been a fixture of Northern California’s timber industry since the 19th century and was until recently the world’s largest producer of redwood timber products.

The widespread interest in Pacific Lumber’s forests reflects the company’s notable and controversial history. Maxxam, led by Houston businessman Charles Hurwitz, used junk bonds in 1986 to purchase the 140-year-old company, then known for environmentally conscious forestry practices. Maxxam accelerated logging in the redwood-dominated timberlands, setting off an environmental firestorm that resulted in stricter regulations and the contribution of 5,600 acres of Pacific Lumber property to the Headwaters Forest Reserve in 1999.

Mendocino Redwood Company and Humboldt Redwood Company
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 01-08-2018, 07:48 AM
Location: Seattle WA, USA
4,319 posts, read 2,578,285 times
Reputation: 2982
Originally Posted by Blind Cleric View Post
Interesting idea. Pretty sure they wouldn't grow in SE Alaska though.

I'm personally more interested in seeing large stands of old growth red cedar and doug fir returning to Washington. There are accounts of Douglas Fir standing just about as tall as coastal redwoods back in the day-over 300 ft.
well according to Wikipedia that redwoods are grown on Haida Gwaii. This is the climate that exists there, which is not all that different from Metlakatla and Sitka. But in either case I wasn't really thinking about Alaska.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top