Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Southwest Nebraska
1,297 posts, read 4,769,343 times
Reputation: 910

Advertisements

Last week here in southwest NE we had a forecast of winter storm warning and 5 to 7 inches of snow possible. Nothing happened and not a word about why it did not happen.

Now out of nowhere they say yesterday we might get a few flurries and at the most a light dusting.

WRONG! We have over an inch on ground and streets covered in white stuff and it has been snowing heavy for over an hour.

I thought all the fancy radars were supposed to help in seeing storm clouds. Good thing we did not plan our Ogalala trip today but did it yesterday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,421,810 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigg Mann View Post
Last week here in southwest NE we had a forecast of winter storm warning and 5 to 7 inches of snow possible. Nothing happened and not a word about why it did not happen.

Now out of nowhere they say yesterday we might get a few flurries and at the most a light dusting.

WRONG! We have over an inch on ground and streets covered in white stuff and it has been snowing heavy for over an hour.

I thought all the fancy radars were supposed to help in seeing storm clouds. Good thing we did not plan our Ogalala trip today but did it yesterday.


If you knew anything about weather forecasting, you know that it is not an exact science and that it is impossible to predict with 100% accuracy due to chaos theory. Also, southwestern Nebraska is one of the most difficult locations to forecast since you are in the lee of the Rockies... and the formation of low pressure systems in the lee of mountains is one of the most unpredictable parts of atmospheric science still.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
4,530 posts, read 8,864,534 times
Reputation: 7602
Back in the 1970's I was driving a delivery truck out of York, NE. One Spring day I had left the plant at York at arounjd 7:00 AM for Grand Island. I had three stops in GI with Hastings, Holdrege and Kearney for the rest of the run. At about 8:30 AM I was leaving the first drop in GI and the sun was shining. By the time I had finished my third drop at about 10:00 AM it was snowing and blowing. I started for Hastings but by the time I got to I-80 it was a full scale blizzard. I stopped at the Holiday Inn at the GI I-80 Interchange to call in and get permission to stay at the Holiday Inn. The boss back in York told me I was crazy. He was looking out the window and it was Blue Sky. I told him to walk out of his office to the West side of the building and look at the sky. I called back twenty minutes later and he said it was a blizzard in York. They immediately shut down production so they could get everybody home before the roads closed. He gladly paid for my room & meals because without my call he would have had to keep everyone at the plant and pay overtime for three shifts. The Spring Blizzard left hundreds stranded but I was in a toasty warm room with a bar and Coffee shop down the hall and the Boss Man footing the bill. Twelve inches of snow in a few hours whipped around by 60 MPH winds makes a heckuva mess. But that is life in Nebraska.

GL2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Western AZ
209 posts, read 432,765 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigg Mann View Post
Last week here in southwest NE we had a forecast of winter storm warning and 5 to 7 inches of snow possible. Nothing happened and not a word about why it did not happen.

Now out of nowhere they say yesterday we might get a few flurries and at the most a light dusting.

WRONG! We have over an inch on ground and streets covered in white stuff and it has been snowing heavy for over an hour.

I thought all the fancy radars were supposed to help in seeing storm clouds. Good thing we did not plan our Ogalala trip today but did it yesterday.
Does that place any doubt in your mind about how accurate the global warming predictions are ? Just sayin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Western Nebraskansas
2,707 posts, read 6,232,456 times
Reputation: 2454
This indicates a confusion between "climate" and "weather"...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Western AZ
209 posts, read 432,765 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsMeFred View Post
This indicates a confusion between "climate" and "weather"...
Actually, the confusion lies in trying to predict how climate change affects the weather, and those predictions seem to be quite dynamic. Assuming of course, you buy into the "theory" of global warming - no wait, they changed if from global warming to climate change. Are they still calling it climate change, or has that changed now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Northeast NE
696 posts, read 1,726,345 times
Reputation: 289
You may want to change your source of weather info.
wunderground.com
theweatherchannel.com
accuweather.com

some choices
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Western Nebraskansas
2,707 posts, read 6,232,456 times
Reputation: 2454
Quote:
Originally Posted by MICHAEL J View Post
Actually, the confusion lies in trying to predict how climate change affects the weather, and those predictions seem to be quite dynamic. Assuming of course, you buy into the "theory" of global warming - no wait, they changed if from global warming to climate change. Are they still calling it climate change, or has that changed now?
Both.
However, again, this indicates a confusion of what we're talking about.

Global warming IS global climate change.
The general shift has been to use the term "global climate change" because people can't seem to understand that just because the earth is getting warmer doesn't mean their own little corner of it will.
In some places the climate will warm, in others, it will cool. Others will dry out, others will get wetter...

The crazy winter that the British Isles had last year, is exemplary of what global warming is expected to do. Yet people seem to think that because that specific area was colder it must mean the globe as a whole is no longer warming. They don't really understand the macro vs. micro effects.

BTW, there's really no disagreement about the fact that the earth is warming, the disagreement is about what's causing it and whether it's normal or not.

Also, day to day meteorology (that is, what shows up on the weather channel on a Tuesday morning) has nothing to do with global warming, climates or anything else.
It's a (relatively) straight-forward science based only on what is present in front of the satellite at any given time and what is known of existing patterns of jet streams, ocean current, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Western AZ
209 posts, read 432,765 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsMeFred View Post
Both.
However, again, this indicates a confusion of what we're talking about.

Global warming IS global climate change.
The general shift has been to use the term "global climate change" because people can't seem to understand that just because the earth is getting warmer doesn't mean their own little corner of it will.
In some places the climate will warm, in others, it will cool. Others will dry out, others will get wetter...

The crazy winter that the British Isles had last year, is exemplary of what global warming is expected to do. Yet people seem to think that because that specific area was colder it must mean the globe as a whole is no longer warming. They don't really understand the macro vs. micro effects.

BTW, there's really no disagreement about the fact that the earth is warming, the disagreement is about what's causing it and whether it's normal or not.

Also, day to day meteorology (that is, what shows up on the weather channel on a Tuesday morning) has nothing to do with global warming, climates or anything else.
It's a (relatively) straight-forward science based only on what is present in front of the satellite at any given time and what is known of existing patterns of jet streams, ocean current, etc.
You missed my point Fred. I was simply trying to point out the absurdity of the long term predictions of climate change, or global warming, whatever the term is today, by illustrating the fact that the weather cannot even be accurately predicted 24 – 48 hrs into the future. Not necessarily trying to debate whether climate change is occurring

“In some places the climate will warm, in others, it will cool. Others will dry out, others will get wetter... “

Funny isn’t it, been doing that since the beginning of time. I was around in the 70’s when the “experts” were predicting an ice age.

As Reported by National Public Radio:

80 percent to 90 percent of global warming involves heating up ocean waters. They hold much more heat than the atmosphere can. So Willis has been studying the ocean with a fleet of robotic instruments called the Argo system. The buoys can dive 3,000 feet down and measure ocean temperature. Since the system was fully deployed in 2003, it has recorded no warming of the global oceans. “There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant," Willis says.

By the way, it’s been cooling significantly here for the past two weeks; I think it’s called “winter”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Western Nebraskansas
2,707 posts, read 6,232,456 times
Reputation: 2454
Quote:
You missed my point Fred. I was simply trying to point out the absurdity of the long term predictions of climate change, or global warming, whatever the term is today, by illustrating the fact that the weather cannot even be accurately predicted 24 – 48 hrs into the future. Not necessarily trying to debate whether climate change is occurring
Not at all. I understood your point perfectly, which is why I said you were confusing "weather" and "climate."


You're comparing apples and steel-belted tires.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top