Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since you couldn't be bothered, this is what he tweeted....
"The Fallen Seven did not receive justice today, and that is an absolute tragedy. I share in the shock, outrage, and anger that so many have expressed in the three years since the seven members of the Jarheads Motorcycle Club were taken from us. My heart goes out to their families, friends, and loved ones on this especially dark day."
Political posturing, or does he have knowledge of findings that didn't make it into the trial testimony?
Since you couldn't be bothered, this is what he tweeted....
"The Fallen Seven did not receive justice today, and that is an absolute tragedy. I share in the shock, outrage, and anger that so many have expressed in the three years since the seven members of the Jarheads Motorcycle Club were taken from us. My heart goes out to their families, friends, and loved ones on this especially dark day."
Political posturing, or does he have knowledge of findings that didn't make it into the trial testimony?
Sorry, didn’t realize I was expected to write it out or include a link. Just alerting people to look for it and draw their own conclusions.
But I feel he should not be weighing in on it. I’m sure it’s just political posturing, but in saying it he is either immediately second-guessing the jury or saying the prosecution didn’t do their job. He is saying the legal system doesn’t work or didn’t work in this case.
Apparently the New Hampshire Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers put out a statement criticizing Sununu as well as the attorney general who said he believed the prosecution proved their case:
“These statements are irresponsible, dangerous, disrespectful to the jurors and damaging to the integrity of the criminal legal system. The are also contrary to the rules designed to protect the rights of the accused and protect jurors from undue influence and harassment.”
Last edited by cowbell76; 08-09-2022 at 08:00 PM..
Looks like Zhukoyskyy might be deported back to the Ukraine.....he will be of better use fighting in the war.
I knew a comment like this would appear. Regardless of anyone's opinion on Zhukoyskyy and/or the ongoing "war" in the Ukraine, mocking the conscription of men and boys to fight and die in globalist wars that only benefit the elite is pretty low.
Last edited by baltimoreguy1; 08-10-2022 at 09:45 AM..
Reason: Spelling
I'm somewhat confused by the change from Coos to Grafton though. Is Grafton HOC where he was staying this whole time?
edit to add from the bottom of the article: "Zhukovskyy has an unresolved operating-under-the-influence case in Connecticut from May 11, 2019. The case is scheduled to be heard on Sept. 1 in Hartford, Connecticut."
Zhukovskyy is now in ICE custody, pending an immigration hearing in October. ICE will have to prove Zhukovskyy is a threat to the community or a flight risk in order to hold him thereafter. He can't be deported to Ukraine because he has temporary protected status due to the war. He also is officially a permanent resident of the US. I imagine he'll walk away from all this too.
In the meantime, he has a hearing for a DWI (a month before the NH crash) in CT on Sept 1st, and MA has finally taken away his driver's licenses.
ETA: He was held at the Coos County jail pre-trial. Maybe he was moved Haverhill for processing after the trial? The feds probably didn't want to go all the way to Stewartstown.
(abnfdc types faster than I do)
Last edited by KCZ; 08-10-2022 at 11:43 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.