Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2009, 08:07 AM
 
3,034 posts, read 9,169,606 times
Reputation: 1741

Advertisements

franconia notch has Cannon mt. - my favorite for NH skiing.

and the tourist spots like the flume and the gorge...really beautiful - I don't know any natives, except for Bode Miller...lol (don't really know him, just know of him)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2009, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Rhode Island (Splash!)
1,150 posts, read 2,707,544 times
Reputation: 444
Connecticut = population 3.5 million

New Hampshire = population 1.3 million

New Hampshire is a little larger than Connecticut.


Okay between this information and the post about the division of New Hampshire into a suburban lower third close to Boston and a rural middle and far north, I really understand more about the scoop on New Hampshire!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,493 posts, read 46,886,053 times
Reputation: 19665
Quote:
Originally Posted by POhdNcrzy View Post
Connecticut = population 3.5 million

New Hampshire = population 1.3 million

New Hampshire is a little larger than Connecticut.


Okay between this information and the post about the division of New Hampshire into a suburban lower third close to Boston and a rural middle and far north, I really understand more about the scoop on New Hampshire!!
The rural 1/3 is super rural by eastern standards. The population density of Coos County is only 18 people per square mile. In contrast, Hillsborough County in southern NH has a population density closer to 500 people per square mile.
The north-central counties of Grafton and Carroll both have densities of around 50 people per square mile. The central tier counties of Belknap, Merrimack, and Sullivan have densities <=150 people per square mile.

The most rural state in New England BY FAR is Maine. Maine has a greater concentration of people living in rural areas compared to nearly every single state. Piscataquis County, Somerset County, Aroostook County, and Franklin County are all very remote places. I hear Moosehead Lake near Greenville has been found by the good old developers, though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Rhode Island (Splash!)
1,150 posts, read 2,707,544 times
Reputation: 444
GraniteStater, do you have a population density figure you could spit out here for a place like the Boston suburbs or Providence suburbs? Just to add to the comparisons here....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 02:02 PM
 
3,034 posts, read 9,169,606 times
Reputation: 1741
Providence RI - a population density of 9,401.67 people per sq. mile for Census 2000.

Boston is at 12K, Somerville @ 18K, Cambridge @ 15K, Chelsea @ 14K per square mile....
Highest population density - The Boston Globe

the larger cities in NH can be found here (as of 2000 data)
Large cities in New Hampshire with the lowest population density

a listing of all 50 states can be found here:
population density of all u.s. states smallest to largest

more than 2/3's of NH residents live in the southeast portion of the state.

our population keeps growing - in 2000, the population density was 137....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,493 posts, read 46,886,053 times
Reputation: 19665
Quote:
Originally Posted by POhdNcrzy View Post
GraniteStater, do you have a population density figure you could spit out here for a place like the Boston suburbs or Providence suburbs? Just to add to the comparisons here....
Sure:
Boston City- about 12,000+ people per sq mile.
Middlesex County, MA- 1,780 people per sq mile.
Essex County, MA- 1,450 people per sq mile
Norfolk County, MA 1,640 people per sq mile.
Plymouth County, MA 740 people per sq mile.
Worcester County, MA 500 people per sq mile.

Providence City- about 9,400 people per sq mile.
Providence County, RI- 1,500 people per sq mile.
Kent County, RI- 985 people per sq mile.
Bristol County, RI- 2,205 people per sq mile.

State and County QuickFacts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 02:05 PM
 
3,034 posts, read 9,169,606 times
Reputation: 1741
"I hear Moosehead Lake near Greenville has been found by the good old developers, though..."

funny you mention that - 30 years ago I was approached by a developer who had purchased land on Moosehead - he was trying to unload some of the properties

I checked it out - it looks nice, but it's sooooo far away - 6 hour drive minimum...no attractions but the woods, and the lake of course...lol


wasn't interested....

for it to ever be a popular resort, it will need better access roads and some shopping (just groceries, would be good)....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2009, 11:08 PM
 
Location: Southern NH
2,541 posts, read 5,871,395 times
Reputation: 1762
Quote:
Originally Posted by buck naked View Post
more than 2/3's of NH residents live in the southeast portion of the state.

....
MA is probably similar, 2/3 if the population in the east 1/4 of the state.... The difference is that MA is losing population....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2009, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,493 posts, read 46,886,053 times
Reputation: 19665
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusnh View Post
MA is probably similar, 2/3 if the population in the east 1/4 of the state.... The difference is that MA is losing population....
The population of Massachusetts has increased 2.3% since the year 2000. The population of Rhode Island, on the other hand, has increased only 0.2% since 2000.

Massachusetts QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
Rhode Island QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau

We should have a better understanding of population and demographic shifts once the 2010 Census is released...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2009, 10:18 AM
 
625 posts, read 2,440,997 times
Reputation: 504
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
The population of Massachusetts has increased 2.3% since the year 2000. The population of Rhode Island, on the other hand, has increased only 0.2% since 2000.

Massachusetts QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
Rhode Island QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau

We should have a better understanding of population and demographic shifts once the 2010 Census is released...
Considering that the birth/death rates alone should have raised the population at least 10 percent, well...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top