Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2011, 02:59 PM
 
3,269 posts, read 9,903,517 times
Reputation: 2025

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
There are no guarantees, there is no absolute safety, there is no way to totally insulate from risk. The key is a balance. But make no mistake. We must have some risk. We must allow some deaths. We must allow some pollution. There is no choice. It has to be reasonable, but life will never be risk free or trouble free.
I guess it's ok to start with your family and kids first then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2011, 03:57 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,048,304 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
No problem, I find that always works best.
As a realtor, I assume you'd be in favor of no home inspections. Caveat emptor. Let the free market reign and all that baloney
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
1,163 posts, read 1,988,480 times
Reputation: 1002
The real question is: If this does NOT really benefit NJ, then why exactly are they building the pipelines in NJ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 06:56 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,749,800 times
Reputation: 4580
Quote:
Originally Posted by stressedCollegeGirl89 View Post
The real question is: If this does NOT really benefit NJ, then why exactly are they building the pipelines in NJ?
Becuz were often used for a shortcut to NYC , it saves them 100s miles....but at what cost. I have no problem with Power lines , that is something we can use in an Emergency like a regional Blackout.... But Pipelines are something entirely different. We do have alot , we do use them , this one is for NYC , so why not reroute it through SI and Brooklyn...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Cranford NJ
1,049 posts, read 4,006,605 times
Reputation: 405
{QUOTE}{Gas lines, electrical lines, nuclear power plants, cell towers, offshore oil wells, Alaskan oil wells, etc. All examples of things we need to develop to compete with the rest of the world and grow our economy. And all things that need to be allowed reasonably freely without regard to local parochial interests. NIMBY has already made us a second rate country. We must not allow overregulation to push us even further backwards.

Better to have less regulation, more profits, more development, more money, more success. A few abuses and a few accidents will happen along the way. Too bad, we can deal with those. Lets underregulate and get things moving!} {QUOTE}



Completely unacceptable! There is enough solar energy, and wind energy to supply the world for generations. This is the direction we should be moving toward. In the last 75 years, we have managed to pollute the world to the point where it is irreparable. The greed, the successes and the development you speak of is of little worth in comparison to the threat to living things, and this living planet. In response to the few deaths....EVERY accident is avoidable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 11:30 PM
 
11,337 posts, read 10,970,443 times
Reputation: 14993
Quote:
Completely unacceptable! There is enough solar energy, and wind energy to supply the world for generations. This is the direction we should be moving toward. In the last 75 years, we have managed to pollute the world to the point where it is irreparable. The greed, the successes and the development you speak of is of little worth in comparison to the threat to living things, and this living planet. In response to the few deaths....EVERY accident is avoidable.
Utter nonsense. Everything must have balance. Pollution can be minimized, but not avoided. Deaths can be minimized, but not avoided. We must never stifle progress with being overly concerned with the environment. We ARE the environment. Man is natural. Everything he does is natural. Every chemical he produces is natural. There is no nature apart from man. Man IS nature.

The environmental Green movement has gone overboard and is a threat to mankind unless properly attenuated by common sense. Certainly "Green" types can offer their opinions and where those opinions are corroborated by data and make logical sense, they can be integrated with progress and forward movement.

However, where the Green movement goes overboard and seeks to stop progress through the application of irrational fear, such as in the fallacy of global warming and climate change, common sense and reality must be emphasized. There is some good in the Green movement, and a LOT OF BAD. Logical citizens must separate the good, integrate it where it makes sense, and DUMP THE REST.

Building nuclear plants, and underground gas lines, and bigger electrical towers in existing rights-of-way containing smaller electrical towers, and drilling for new oil in Alaska and offshore? All examples of activities that are necessary and proper. All examples of activities that should be done with care, but MUST BE DONE to move our society forward. We must never fear what will happen should we undertake progress. We must prepare for risk, minimize adverse risk where possible, and move forward, in the spirit of those that achieved greatness by doing just that. Such as the astronauts who landed on the Moon in the face of tremendous risk and danger. Or the explorers who boarded ships for the New World in the face of unknowable perils laying just over the horizon.

Our heroes need to remain the astronauts and the inventors and the innovators and the risk-takers and the great explorers, not the mediocrities, not the Al Gores and Michael Moores of the world.

Let's build and achieve greatness, not "conserve" phony resources invented by the weak to stifle our magnificence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2011, 06:59 AM
 
19,037 posts, read 25,112,413 times
Reputation: 25351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
Better to have less regulation, more profits, more development, more money, more success. A few abuses and a few accidents will happen along the way. Too bad, we can deal with those. Lets underregulate and get things moving!


...because deregulation of the financial services industry and the airlines worked so well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2011, 08:19 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,473,541 times
Reputation: 14621
Why are folks so up in arms over this tunnel, when we all spend pretty much our entire lives going about our daily business on top of millions of miles of natural gas pipelines? There really is no more inherent risk to this pipeline than there is from the one that runs into your home. So if we aren't protesting in the streets (we're actually huddled in our homes/offices warmed by natural gas) over pipelines in general, why get all worked up over this one?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2011, 12:05 PM
 
857 posts, read 1,995,573 times
Reputation: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
There are no guarantees, there is no absolute safety, there is no way to totally insulate from risk. The key is a balance. But make no mistake. We must have some risk. We must allow some deaths. We must allow some pollution. There is no choice. It has to be reasonable, but life will never be risk free or trouble free.
typical juvenile libertarian position. You'll understand what us adults are talking about here when you grow up someday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2011, 01:00 PM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,331 posts, read 20,668,041 times
Reputation: 9852
Don't intend to drift off topic here, but a 'shout out' is due to Spectra's GIS mapping division for putting together an incredibly intuitive map here. The ability to construct something like this requires a lot of right-brain skills. Just marveling aloud, seeing this is what I do for a living....

Back to topic at hand.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top