Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2011, 02:24 PM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,678,860 times
Reputation: 14622

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradykp View Post
and there is the problem many towns face...everyone wants the cheap store to pick up their made-in-china junk, but they don't want all the negatives that come with the stores. lol good luck! i hope your town grows "smartly"
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
and they complain that taxes are so high but don't want any ratables to help offset them.

"I want what I want but I don't want to pay for it and I want my taxes to go down too"

I'm lucky with "my town" as the township is very large and was rather intelligently designed. We also have a massive industrial park and some industries located on the opposite side of the highway from where 95% of the town lives. It gives us a huge ratable base without the headaches. When the talk of Lowe's and Target started around here and that they may be placed in my township they logically decided to place them away from the major population centers, but at the intersection of two major highways. Growth in my town was exactly 10 people over the past decade, so rather stable.

The next town over is a different story, where they are throwing up housing like crazy and planning to build everything under the sun. It has been funny watching the same people who caused the boom by moving there, now getting up in arms that their property taxes are through the roof (250+% more kids in the schools) do to the lack of ratables, as the town only really has residential and that the traffic is getting worse on the two lane country roads that have to carry everyone to the highways to get to work. Yet those same people are the ones who lament the lack of Starbucks and a nearby Target.

Looking at the two towns side-by-side it is almost a case study in intelligent growth versus uncontrolled growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2011, 10:20 AM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,683,201 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
I'm lucky with "my town" as the township is very large and was rather intelligently designed. We also have a massive industrial park and some industries located on the opposite side of the highway from where 95% of the town lives. It gives us a huge ratable base without the headaches. When the talk of Lowe's and Target started around here and that they may be placed in my township they logically decided to place them away from the major population centers, but at the intersection of two major highways. Growth in my town was exactly 10 people over the past decade, so rather stable.

The next town over is a different story, where they are throwing up housing like crazy and planning to build everything under the sun. It has been funny watching the same people who caused the boom by moving there, now getting up in arms that their property taxes are through the roof (250+% more kids in the schools) do to the lack of ratables, as the town only really has residential and that the traffic is getting worse on the two lane country roads that have to carry everyone to the highways to get to work. Yet those same people are the ones who lament the lack of Starbucks and a nearby Target.

Looking at the two towns side-by-side it is almost a case study in intelligent growth versus uncontrolled growth.
People never think they're the issue, it's always the other guy. I guess it's human nature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 03:41 PM
 
1,437 posts, read 2,571,524 times
Reputation: 1190
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
yes but this is not confined to south and coast. that's my point.

I see from the cencus tract posting. The population is shifting away from NE NJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top