Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2012, 06:41 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,075,803 times
Reputation: 2889

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
These companies were looking at sites in other states with more favorable tax codes and operating costs.

If they DID move, you guys would be complaining and blaming Christie for the loss of jobs.

To some people, Christie can't win no matter what he does.
And once again you & manderly are wrong!

The state approved up to $250 million in tax credits last year for Prudential, Newark’s most important corporate citizen, to build a new office tower. The company acknowledged that the jobs were not “at risk” of leaving the state and that renewing its leases at three buildings in the nearby Gateway complex were the “low-cost options by a wide margin when compared to the cost of new construction.”

The $250.8 million in tax credits, however, made the office tower project possible. In return, Prudential claimed it would create 400 new jobs, including 100 coming from outside New Jersey. The other new jobs were based on the company’s past growth patterns, which presumably would occur at either location.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/ny...pagewanted=all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2012, 06:57 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,247,690 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
And once again you & manderly are wrong!

The state approved up to $250 million in tax credits last year for Prudential, Newark’s most important corporate citizen, to build a new office tower. The company acknowledged that the jobs were not “at risk” of leaving the state and that renewing its leases at three buildings in the nearby Gateway complex were the “low-cost options by a wide margin when compared to the cost of new construction.”

The $250.8 million in tax credits, however, made the office tower project possible. In return, Prudential claimed it would create 400 new jobs, including 100 coming from outside New Jersey. The other new jobs were based on the company’s past growth patterns, which presumably would occur at either location.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/ny...pagewanted=all
And once again, you are misrepresenting the facts. The other two companies were indeed looking at other states. Do I really need to search for the articles?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 07:02 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,075,803 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
And once again, you are misrepresenting the facts. The other two companies were indeed looking at other states. Do I really need to search for the articles?
It's nice to back up arguments with evidence...especially for Christie lovers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 07:06 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,247,690 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
It's nice to back up arguments with evidence...especially for Christie lovers.
OK. Read your own article. It says it right there, at least regarding Panasonic.
Quote:
Panasonic of North America’s chairman, Joseph M. Taylor, said, “Absent the tax incentives, Jersey wouldn’t have been an option."
Keep in mind, when these companies move to another state, we lose ALL the corporate tax AND ALL the income tax from the people that work for them. From a business standpoint, it makes sense to try to keep them here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 07:25 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,075,803 times
Reputation: 2889
I laughed at the headline which is all too common when you're dealing with corporate welfare and "threats of moving":

New Jersey Offers Goya $80 Million to Create Nine New Jobs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 07:30 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,247,690 times
Reputation: 14335
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
I laughed at the headline which is all too common when you're dealing with corporate welfare and "threats of moving":

New Jersey Offers Goya $80 Million to Create Nine New Jobs
However, we are also stealing jobs from NY and keeping jobs here that might otherwise leave. And what is the cost? It's not like we are shelling out $80 Million. It is just money that we are not getting, but as I said, if they move, we lose that AND A WHOLE LOT MORE. From a business standpoint it is the right move.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 07:39 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,141,127 times
Reputation: 16279
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
And once again you & manderly are wrong!

The state approved up to $250 million in tax credits last year for Prudential, Newark’s most important corporate citizen, to build a new office tower. The company acknowledged that the jobs were not “at risk” of leaving the state and that renewing its leases at three buildings in the nearby Gateway complex were the “low-cost options by a wide margin when compared to the cost of new construction.”

The $250.8 million in tax credits, however, made the office tower project possible. In return, Prudential claimed it would create 400 new jobs, including 100 coming from outside New Jersey. The other new jobs were based on the company’s past growth patterns, which presumably would occur at either location.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/ny...pagewanted=all
You should read what is posted more closely. The post was not about Prudential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 08:24 PM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,814 posts, read 34,684,299 times
Reputation: 10256
Quote:
Originally Posted by manderly6 View Post
You should read what is posted more closely. The post was not about Prudential.
It said this.

The state approved up to $250 million in tax credits last year for Prudential, Newark’s most important corporate citizen, to build a new office tower. The company acknowledged that the jobs were not “at risk” of leaving the state and that renewing its leases at three buildings in the nearby Gateway complex were the “low-cost options by a wide margin when compared to the cost of new construction.”

The $250.8 million in tax credits, however, made the office tower project possible. In return, Prudential claimed it would create 400 new jobs, including 100 coming from outside New Jersey. The other new jobs were based on the company’s past growth patterns, which presumably would occur at either location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 08:57 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,141,127 times
Reputation: 16279
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
It said this.

The state approved up to $250 million in tax credits last year for Prudential, Newark’s most important corporate citizen, to build a new office tower. The company acknowledged that the jobs were not “at risk” of leaving the state and that renewing its leases at three buildings in the nearby Gateway complex were the “low-cost options by a wide margin when compared to the cost of new construction.”

The $250.8 million in tax credits, however, made the office tower project possible. In return, Prudential claimed it would create 400 new jobs, including 100 coming from outside New Jersey. The other new jobs were based on the company’s past growth patterns, which presumably would occur at either location.
I know what you said. But if you go back and read what I responded to it had nothing to do with Prudential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top