Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But what if you think like I do that people with the desire to own personal arsenals ARE unbalanced to begin with? Nothing in a background check that lists "wants his own Fort Bragg" is going to set off alarm bells.
I have some good friends with multiple weapons and while I don't think they are nuts I am concerned after all they are Republicans.
But what if you think like I do that people with the desire to own personal arsenals ARE unbalanced to begin with? Nothing in a background check that lists "wants his own Fort Bragg" is going to set off alarm bells.
and it shouldnt. the last thing anyone would want is for you to be making any laws. however, you are especially unqualified in making laws regarding guns since you havent even bothered learning the basic facts about guns. i think you should focus your energy on getting those cop killer bullets banned; that seems to be very important to you.
if someone wants an arsenal, then they should be free to spend their money and get an arsenal. oh, how many guns would you consider an arsenal?
So would go my logic in the gun debate. If some states have lax laws that allow for the easy trafficking of firearms into other states where they invariably end up being used in crimes; then the burden should be on those states to change their laws if such a change would have a tangible impact, which it would. In that light, it could be argued that the Federal government has a duty to take action.
im not really sure what exactly is proposed and fought against. people make out the republicans as unwilling to compromise on anything, but i dont really know thats true. but i also think that guns arent thought of the same way as toxic waste. there are so many people throughout the country that think positively about guns and think the best way to stop that violence, isnt registration but more carry permits. so i guess its tough for people to agree when they have such different views on the subject.
and it shouldnt. the last thing anyone would want is for you to be making any laws. however, you are especially unqualified in making laws regarding guns since you havent even bothered learning the basic facts about guns. i think you should focus your energy on getting those cop killer bullets banned; that seems to be very important to you.
if someone wants an arsenal, then they should be free to spend their money and get an arsenal. oh, how many guns would you consider an arsenal?
I think you've overplayed this hand with EBwick. Your lack of expertise in hurricanes, flooding, structural engineering, etc., did not slow you in your (misguided) Sandy opinions.
That's the biggest problem, gun owners who reject at any laws that make them responsible for their guns.
I'm responsible for my actions, not my objects. Though the post you responded to had nothing to do with that.
Quote:
As far as I'm concerned anybody who doesn't want to register their guns has something to hide.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't post with their full real name on a message board has something to hide, and should be denied the right to speak.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who doesn't post with their full real name on a message board has something to hide, and should be denied the right to speak.
So you're concerned about people who love freedom and uphold the Bill of Rights. You sound like a Redcoat.
They love freedom for rich white males, and fetuses. Since I'm a woman, I'm automatically out of the freedom picture. Once those fetuses are born, unless they are born to rich white males, they're pretty much out of luck when it comes to freedom too. Oh, and also minorities, because we can't have no colored folks owning guns.(sarcasm).
So you're concerned about people who love freedom and uphold the Bill of Rights. You sound like a Redcoat.
I'm kind of thinking that recognizing sarcasm is not your expertise.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
