U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2013, 02:10 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,242 posts, read 4,937,168 times
Reputation: 1841

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyGirl415 View Post
We need some sort of change.
We did vote for a "Change" in 2008, didn't we? Did we see any Change?

Let's face it, we live in a state and country that barely has resources to fix existing roads, rails and bridges. Upgrading NJ-NY connection is way too expensive by any standard. And even if we have the funding, it is a infrastructure change that is a massive undertaking. Not going to happen anytime soon.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2013, 05:21 PM
 
12,891 posts, read 13,131,102 times
Reputation: 18434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
Rahway does have Express trains , that only stop at Newark Penn , Secaucus and New York.
Thanks, I didn't know that. I'd be willing to go to Rahway, it's not too far from me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davenj08 View Post
We did vote for a "Change" in 2008, didn't we? Did we see any Change?

Let's face it, we live in a state and country that barely has resources to fix existing roads, rails and bridges. Upgrading NJ-NY connection is way too expensive by any standard. And even if we have the funding, it is a infrastructure change that is a massive undertaking. Not going to happen anytime soon.
Haha!

I know. Expensive, difficult, and would cause mayhem. We're so densely populated that adding additional lines and tracks would probably be hard and cause a lot of issues. It's like how they're planning on revamping the Goethals Bridge - they have their ways, but I don't know how they're going to be able to do it while it's still in use if they're planing a full overhaul (which it needs desperately)! Engineering is pretty amazing.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2013, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
82,398 posts, read 75,740,574 times
Reputation: 105500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyGirl415 View Post
Thanks, I didn't know that. I'd be willing to go to Rahway, it's not too far from me.



Haha!

I know. Expensive, difficult, and would cause mayhem. We're so densely populated that adding additional lines and tracks would probably be hard and cause a lot of issues. It's like how they're planning on revamping the Goethals Bridge - they have their ways, but I don't know how they're going to be able to do it while it's still in use if they're planing a full overhaul (which it needs desperately)! Engineering is pretty amazing.
It's not being overhauled. A new cable-stayed bridge is being built to the south of the existing bridge. The existing bridge will remain in service until the new bridge is completed, probably 2017-18, and then the existing bridge will be taken down.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2013, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,226 posts, read 5,874,248 times
Reputation: 4967
Amtrak is spearheading the effort to build another two-track tunnel into Penn Station. It's called the Gateway project. It should be cheaper, and far more useful than ARC was.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2013, 09:45 PM
 
24,497 posts, read 39,725,174 times
Reputation: 12910
Quote:
Originally Posted by davenj08 View Post
We did vote for a "Change" in 2008, didn't we? Did we see any Change?

Let's face it, we live in a state and country that barely has resources to fix existing roads, rails and bridges. Upgrading NJ-NY connection is way too expensive by any standard. And even if we have the funding, it is a infrastructure change that is a massive undertaking. Not going to happen anytime soon.
If they charged more for ridership tickets and scrapped unions for conductors, we'd have improved rail.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top