Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2013, 06:20 PM
 
4,286 posts, read 10,766,068 times
Reputation: 3810

Advertisements

Minimum wage workers account for 4.7 percent of hourly paid workers in 2012 : The Editor’s Desk : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Once you take out those under 24 and add in salaried employees, you are looking at under 2% of the country that is making minimum wage. I think people are overstating the impact of this on the economy.

$8.25 is a reasonable amount and I have always thought tying it to inflation was a good idea. Small annual adjustments are less of a shock to employers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2013, 06:41 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,256,089 times
Reputation: 9252
I think too many voted "yes" without thinking about how it's going to affect them in the long run.

Today we adjusted prices to compensate until the trickle down from the wholesalers & distributers hit us in Jan.

And next year, when the COL goes up and so does minimum wage, again? Prices will increase again.

Think about it: 20 employees who work an average of 2080 hours per year.

For employers who were paying $8/hr: that's an additional $520+ per year per employee (employee paycheck increases? So does business owner's workman's comp, etc., per employee).

So a little over $10,400 of a payroll increase.

For those who were paying $7.25/hr with 20 employees? Increase of over $40K per year in payroll.

Now take in to consideration that the manufacturers, wholesalers and distributers will also be passing their increases in payroll down the line and to the retailer.

Who is going to eat it in the end? The consumer. And ESPECIALLY the consumer who didn't increase his/her paycheck by minimum wage increasing.

Last edited by Informed Info; 11-06-2013 at 07:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 06:47 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,344 posts, read 16,699,701 times
Reputation: 13363
Quote:
Originally Posted by I love Blue Laws View Post
Not true. Walmart still exist in Canada, and minimum wages are higher over there, free national healthcare and better quality of life.
Really??? Care to show me a store link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:03 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,137,120 times
Reputation: 16274
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
Minimum wage workers account for 4.7 percent of hourly paid workers in 2012 : The Editor’s Desk : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Once you take out those under 24 and add in salaried employees, you are looking at under 2% of the country that is making minimum wage. I think people are overstating the impact of this on the economy.

$8.25 is a reasonable amount and I have always thought tying it to inflation was a good idea. Small annual adjustments are less of a shock to employers.
I think you have to consider the knock on effect. Take the guy that was currently making $8.00 an hour or $9.00 an hour. If he was worth XX more than minimum wage before is he worth that much more now? Do you have to also bump him up as well? And so on. So I think the reality is this impacts more people than just those currently making the minimum wage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:08 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,463 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14334
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
Minimum wage workers account for 4.7 percent of hourly paid workers in 2012 : The Editor’s Desk : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Once you take out those under 24 and add in salaried employees, you are looking at under 2% of the country that is making minimum wage. I think people are overstating the impact of this on the economy.

$8.25 is a reasonable amount and I have always thought tying it to inflation was a good idea. Small annual adjustments are less of a shock to employers.
I'm not sure why you would cancel out those under the age of 24. Paying them a dollar more costs the same exact amount as paying an older person a dollar more. But the impact is still there because in economics, what starts out as a small percentage, grows. Prices rise in one sector, say fast food, or clothing, or whatever, and then you have to pay someone else more to be able to afford that, then you have to pay someone else more to afford whatever THAT person is selling. And so on, and so on. As you said, $8.25 is reasonable considering how stagnant low end wages are, and maybe we should consider raising it more often than we do currently, but I think they just created a positive feedback loop, that over time will lead to higher inflation than we have seen in a while. I hope I am wrong. What's done is done, so all we can do is watch and see what happens. I'm also curious to see what happens with this $15.00 minimum wage in Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:10 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,463 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14334
Quote:
Originally Posted by manderly6 View Post
I think you have to consider the knock on effect. Take the guy that was currently making $8.00 an hour or $9.00 an hour. If he was worth XX more than minimum wage before is he worth that much more now? Do you have to also bump him up as well? And so on. So I think the reality is this impacts more people than just those currently making the minimum wage.
I was typing this at the same time you were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
3,410 posts, read 4,466,382 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I'm also curious to see what happens with this $15.00 minimum wage in Seattle.
It's only at the airport and surrounding locales(hotels). To a large extent, they are passing on increased costs to out-of-towners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:15 PM
 
4,286 posts, read 10,766,068 times
Reputation: 3810
Quote:
Originally Posted by manderly6 View Post
I think you have to consider the knock on effect. Take the guy that was currently making $8.00 an hour or $9.00 an hour. If he was worth XX more than minimum wage before is he worth that much more now? Do you have to also bump him up as well? And so on. So I think the reality is this impacts more people than just those currently making the minimum wage.
I do agree. That's part of the reason why figuring out a number, setting it permanently, and tying it to inflation is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:20 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Garden State
2,734 posts, read 4,150,019 times
Reputation: 3671
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I agree with you, but I don't think WalMart, McDonalds, and other minimum wage jobs were ever meant to support a middle class lifestyle. Real middle class jobs have been moved to China and other countries. If you try to turn minimum wage jobs into middle class jobs you will see significant inflation. If you want to buy cheap stuff at WalMart, you have to keep the cost of getting those products to the consumers, down. If we really want to build the middle class back up, we need to figure out how to keep those types of jobs here in the US. Globalization is the culprit in the growing wealth gap. When all is said and done, the only jobs we will have left are either highly skilled ones, or ones that take no skills at all. We don't build anything anymore. We have become a service economy. Doctors, Lawyers, and financial services on one end, and fast food workers, retail workers, cab drivers, etc on the other. The only middle class jobs that will be left are the ones that can't be outsourced or automated. Government jobs and tradesmen. And tradesmen are under constant threat by illegal immigrants.
Sadly, the true "working class" has been almost obliterated in this country. It used to be that a man could work his whole lifetime in a factory, auto plant or shipyard and support a wife and children. He could be proud of his work.

Now those jobs have been replaced by "Walmart" type jobs that don't pay enough to support a family, and certainly don't give much worker satisfaction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2013, 07:28 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,463 posts, read 15,244,932 times
Reputation: 14334
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerJAX View Post
It's only at the airport and surrounding locales(hotels). To a large extent, they are passing on increased costs to out-of-towners.
Hmm. That's actually pretty smart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top