Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2014, 02:33 PM
 
144 posts, read 163,617 times
Reputation: 161

Advertisements

I am looking to buy a place and since I am priced out of nice areas in NYC, i am looking at nearby commuter towns. I came across this article which has a map that shows % change in children under 5yo in different towns in northern NJ: NYC beckons new parents as North Jersey suburbs no longer seen as only place to raise kids - Family - NorthJersey.com.

I actually went to the census data and checked it for these towns and they all lost a lot of 34-44 cohort as well (which figures as these people would have kids under 5 yo) and the picture is similar in towns to the south-west of this map.

I find this picture extremely puzzling. It seems that "nicer" places such as Ridgewood and Wyckoff, Westfield to the south are hemmoraging young families. At the same time, places like Madison actually had a modest increase growth and Cliffside and Lyndhurst are growing very rapidly. Why is that? Cliffside/Lyndhurst are not nearly as nice, and Madison is farther from the city. It seems kinda random to me. My first choice moving out of NYC would be Westfield, but it lost nearly 25% of people in the 34-44 age group (my age group) in the last 10 years. Is there something wrong with this place? Why are people leaving and where are they moving to? I want to avoid buying in a town with a death spiral tax dynamic, where eroding tax base leads to higher taxes, which leads to further erosion of tax base, etc. I also get the entire negative demographic trend situation. And I get that my generation prefers living in urban environment. But definitely urban has become very unaffordable, i just cant get my mind around where are all the people going, and where they will be going in the next 10 years. I dont want to lose money on the house. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2014, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Randolph, NJ
4,073 posts, read 8,976,235 times
Reputation: 3262
Well, I think one significant factor was the recession and burst housing bubble. To some extent, there was a lot less movement of real estate over the past 7 years, so a lot of the people may not have moved, but simply aged out of that age group. And mortgage lending got tighter, so younger home buyers had more difficulty qualifying for loans, making it harder to get into some sought-after towns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 02:47 PM
 
144 posts, read 163,617 times
Reputation: 161
Prices did not come down in those towns I dont think theres a lot of underwater houses which could prevent people from moving (selling). Buyers in the 34-44 group are very likely to be first-time buyers with no prior mortgages. And - places like Jersey City, Hoboken at the same time exploded - RE crisis or not and they are more expensive now on a sf basis and still not nearly as nice. There's a lot of places in NYC area where prices skyrocketed and population grew. So people do move, and they do have money to buy. Just not in these "nice" bedroom communities. Why? I sense that there's some deeper trend going on here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Summit
400 posts, read 793,138 times
Reputation: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbandweller13 View Post
I am looking to buy a place and since I am priced out of nice areas in NYC, i am looking at nearby commuter towns. I came across this article which has a map that shows % change in children under 5yo in different towns in northern NJ: NYC beckons new parents as North Jersey suburbs no longer seen as only place to raise kids - Family - NorthJersey.com.

I actually went to the census data and checked it for these towns and they all lost a lot of 34-44 cohort as well (which figures as these people would have kids under 5 yo) and the picture is similar in towns to the south-west of this map.

I find this picture extremely puzzling. It seems that "nicer" places such as Ridgewood and Wyckoff, Westfield to the south are hemmoraging young families. At the same time, places like Madison actually had a modest increase growth and Cliffside and Lyndhurst are growing very rapidly. Why is that? Cliffside/Lyndhurst are not nearly as nice, and Madison is farther from the city. It seems kinda random to me. My first choice moving out of NYC would be Westfield, but it lost nearly 25% of people in the 34-44 age group (my age group) in the last 10 years. Is there something wrong with this place? Why are people leaving and where are they moving to? I want to avoid buying in a town with a death spiral tax dynamic, where eroding tax base leads to higher taxes, which leads to further erosion of tax base, etc. I also get the entire negative demographic trend situation. And I get that my generation prefers living in urban environment. But definitely urban has become very unaffordable, i just cant get my mind around where are all the people going, and where they will be going in the next 10 years. I dont want to lose money on the house. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
I recently read a different article about how the cities are rising faster than suburbs, even for families.

I know of Westfield from going there from time to time, but I can't say much about the market, demographics, etc. Perhaps people who would be moving to Westfield are instead moving to more city-like places with easier access into the city. I can't speak for Lyndhurst, but I know that Madison is a great place for young families because of the school, access to major highways like I-287, its downtown, and probably the most important thing: direct access to NYC via train. Westfield has a transfer involved (although I know they're doing a test-run for direct route into NYC), so even if it's a little closer, geographically, to NYC, the commute time is basically the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 04:28 PM
 
144 posts, read 163,617 times
Reputation: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by samanthayakobchuk View Post
I recently read a different article about how the cities are rising faster than suburbs, even for families.

I know of Westfield from going there from time to time, but I can't say much about the market, demographics, etc. Perhaps people who would be moving to Westfield are instead moving to more city-like places with easier access into the city. I can't speak for Lyndhurst, but I know that Madison is a great place for young families because of the school, access to major highways like I-287, its downtown, and probably the most important thing: direct access to NYC via train. Westfield has a transfer involved (although I know they're doing a test-run for direct route into NYC), so even if it's a little closer, geographically, to NYC, the commute time is basically the same.
Commute is all relative to where you're going in the city. Penn Station is not really a great point in the city to be getting to as it is far from midtown east and downtown business areas. In my case it would do nothing for me, and commute to WTC is 30 minutes shorter from WF.. I doubt its the direct train to Penn Station that is the attraction. I would imagine higher RE taxes in WF could be a turn off though. This is worrisome
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 04:49 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,073,085 times
Reputation: 2889
All about the benjamins. Unless you make Wall St. robber baron/plastic surgeon/corporate lawyer cash you're priced out of those places from the start. It aint Mom & Dad's Bergen or Morris County anymore. It's why the population of NJ has been moving toward Central Jersey the last couple of decades. Wherever it's still considered a "reasonable" commute to NYC or North Jersey. Freehold, northern Monmouth and towns on the Coast Line being the outer limits. Same when you head out to Western NJ. The mutts of Jersey still need places to live, At least until the entire state is Upper West Side-erized. Then you'll have to bus in guest workers from PA & upstate NY like some sort Middle Eastern petro state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 04:55 PM
 
144 posts, read 163,617 times
Reputation: 161
So why arent 34-44 yo lawyers/bankers/plastic surgeons buying in Westfield? Or Ridgewood? Trust me when I say it that a very small portion of these affluent groups can afford to live in what may be more desirable NYC locations where 2br apartments start at $1.5m these days (which gets you a 5bdr in a nice NJ town).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 05:03 PM
 
901 posts, read 2,247,801 times
Reputation: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbandweller13 View Post
So why arent 34-44 yo lawyers/bankers/plastic surgeons buying in Westfield? Or Ridgewood? Trust me when I say it that a very small portion of these affluent groups can afford to live in what may be more desirable NYC locations where 2br apartments start at $1.5m these days (which gets you a 5bdr in a nice NJ town).
Who says there not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,522,873 times
Reputation: 998
Clifton is on the cheap side and it's more working class. That's probably accounts for the 15% gain. Places like Wycoff and Ridgewood are off the wall in terms of pricing, hence the loss.

The map is actually straightforward. For those who want to buy a home, it's going to be cheaper in Clifton and Hackensack than the already established and affluent areas of Bergen County. What I would be more curious about is a map covering Somerset and Morris Counties. The population map on the webapge is just for Bergen, which is known for its disparity in wealth between it's borders (and extremely high taxes.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2014, 06:41 PM
 
144 posts, read 163,617 times
Reputation: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by OysterCatcher View Post
Who says there not?
Says US census. Shows population decline in this age group in these towns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top