Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-05-2014, 12:33 PM
 
1,247 posts, read 3,025,570 times
Reputation: 651

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyGirl415 View Post
I have to say I've actually always found New York's way kind of confusing. At least we don't have municipalities within municipalities, at least in most places, which is what New York seems to do.
But many townships in NJ have unincorporated areas within them with names you occasionally hear. Take Woodbridge for instance. It is a township of 100,000 people, but it has all these areas contained within its borders: Avenel, Colonia, Fords, Hopelawn, Keasbey, Iselin, Port Reading, Sewaren and Menlo Park Terrace. Kind of confusing if you don't know the area well.

Other areas have historic names that often get used in place of the parent township's name even when referring to areas outside the historic village. Evesham Township in South Jersey contains Marlton, a small historic village, but too often do people refer to the whole town as Marlton.

New York City is made up of five boroughs. And AFAIK, there are no other boroughs in New York State. Upstate NY just calls their townships towns, and the smaller areas we call boroughs here in NJ are called Villages in Upstate NY. And the other unincorporated types of places mentioned above are called Hamlets in NY.

I personally feel that if we unincorporate some of the boroughs here in NJ and make them part of the nearby township, we could save a lot of money here, that is wasted too much on useless, unnecessary local governments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2014, 12:48 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,241,584 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJhighlands87 View Post
people wonder why they have high property taxes ... yet still resist ... consolidation.
There are no economies of scale in NJ. Large cities are poorly run and have far more public workers per 1,000 residents than small towns. More police, but much more crime. Suburban fire depts. are volunteer, cost far less than paid urban depts. Schools are much better; the large urban districts are mostly terrible despite spending far more per student that the smaller suburban districts. Also, the corrupt NJ Supreme Court and politicians force the suburban taxpayers to fund the urban districts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2014, 12:47 AM
 
Location: D.C. / I-95
2,751 posts, read 2,421,600 times
Reputation: 3363
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjake54 View Post
There are no economies of scale in NJ. Large cities are poorly run and have far more public workers per 1,000 residents than small towns. More police, but much more crime. Suburban fire depts. are volunteer, cost far less than paid urban depts. Schools are much better; the large urban districts are mostly terrible despite spending far more per student that the smaller suburban districts. Also, the corrupt NJ Supreme Court and politicians force the suburban taxpayers to fund the urban districts.
Ok...? Consolidation doesnt mean Newark and Camden get to eat up all of the towns in nj
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2014, 06:45 AM
 
1,620 posts, read 3,774,139 times
Reputation: 1187
Almost like we need to start over. Start a new county and only allow towns of a certain size to join, share most resources and try to prevent the county machine from taking over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2014, 07:49 AM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,076,477 times
Reputation: 2889
There's been talk in Trenton of forced consolidation for small towns. Almost half of BC could probably consolidate. At least police and fire to start. One police force could easily patrol Allendale, Ho-Ho-Kus and Waldwick with about half the personnel they have now as 3 separate forces.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top