Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-24-2014, 11:55 AM
 
18 posts, read 18,825 times
Reputation: 18

Advertisements

Where's the EPA when it comes to the people of New Jersey...
Please sign the new petition

Get the Ramapo, Pequannock, Pompton, Passaic Rivers Dredged.

People that never got flooded is now flooding due to the gates put on the Pompton Dam.

https://www.causes.com/campaigns/81091-get-the-ramapo-pequannock-pompton-passaic-rivers-dredged?recruiter_id=59628385
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2014, 12:19 PM
 
Location: High Bridge, NJ
3,859 posts, read 9,979,006 times
Reputation: 3400
First of all EPA has nothing to do with this. The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control projects. Second of all, who in their right mind would sign their name to a petition with such a glaring grammatical error in the title? Third, flooding in NJ is caused by two things: Overdevelopment and excessive amounts of impervious cover (roofs, parking lots, etc...), and development that was allowed in areas where it never should have been (ie: along the Ramapo, Pequannock, Pompton, and Passaic Rivers)-the Army Corps can't build flood control projects fast enough to control the ever greater amounts of runoff flowing into these rivers because it has no place else to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2014, 03:17 PM
 
3,305 posts, read 3,868,278 times
Reputation: 2591
I concur! Walter Peck, EPA agent, is too busy chasing ghosts out in New York instead of looking out for the real environmental menaces.
EPA Shuts Down Local Ghost-Entrapment Business
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2014, 09:17 PM
 
18 posts, read 18,825 times
Reputation: 18
Default Something smells awfully fishy here...

What a joke. Do not support these people, because 'petition with such a glaring grammatical error in the title.' Badfish740

Something smells awfully fishy here...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 04:34 AM
 
Location: High Bridge, NJ
3,859 posts, read 9,979,006 times
Reputation: 3400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marine69to71 View Post
What a joke. Do not support these people, because 'petition with such a glaring grammatical error in the title.' Badfish740

Something smells awfully fishy here...
Well, that part was a joke-the fact that EPA has nothing to do with flood control and that overdevelopment and the fact that NJ has allowed extensive building in floodplains for years were the real reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2014, 06:11 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,213,191 times
Reputation: 10895
To be fair, a lot of the houses and buildings in floodplains are the older ones; there's a lot of reasons floodplains tended to get built in FIRST.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2014, 07:40 PM
 
860 posts, read 1,337,937 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
To be fair, a lot of the houses and buildings in floodplains are the older ones; there's a lot of reasons floodplains tended to get built in FIRST.
And one of the reasons for that is the floodplains of the past were less expansive than they are today. So those old houses, while currently residing within a floodplain, likely weren't in a flood plain when they were constructed. The development and paving that has taken place all over the State has forced more water into the river channel and therefore increased the size of the floodplains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2014, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,584 posts, read 84,795,337 times
Reputation: 115105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badfish740 View Post
First of all EPA has nothing to do with this. The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control projects. Second of all, who in their right mind would sign their name to a petition with such a glaring grammatical error in the title? Third, flooding in NJ is caused by two things: Overdevelopment and excessive amounts of impervious cover (roofs, parking lots, etc...), and development that was allowed in areas where it never should have been (ie: along the Ramapo, Pequannock, Pompton, and Passaic Rivers)-the Army Corps can't build flood control projects fast enough to control the ever greater amounts of runoff flowing into these rivers because it has no place else to go.
This pretty much sums it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top