Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-26-2008, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Cream Ridge, NJ
445 posts, read 1,984,085 times
Reputation: 280

Advertisements

GSP stretch dropping to 55 mph | APP.com | Asbury Park Press

Another way to get more revenue in speeding tickets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2008, 05:36 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,339 posts, read 16,693,938 times
Reputation: 13341
They do claim that there's a high percentage of accidents along that part of the Parkway.

Let's see what happens after 1 year if the accidents decrease with the speed of 55...even though most drivers will still do 70+.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
604 posts, read 2,913,608 times
Reputation: 267
If people would put down the cell phones and stop tailgating we could all travel at 75MPH with few crashes. There is no such thing as an accident. When a meteor hits your car that an accident, everything else is somebodys fault.

According to the experts in Germany the Autobahn which has no speed limit, most of the crashes are caused by tailgaters.

Last edited by emanon; 01-27-2008 at 06:53 AM.. Reason: deleted wrong word
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Toms River, NJ
1,106 posts, read 4,897,408 times
Reputation: 656
I wonder if the fact that these roads tend to go from 4 lanes to 3 (exit 91 or 98 south) without much warning or the acceleration lanes getting on (specifically 88 north bound) has such a short lane contributes to the number of accidents.

I also wonder if these accidents happen more at certain times of the day. I seem to remember when the speed limit was raised that they touted "speed not being a factor" in many accidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: The Garden State
1,334 posts, read 2,992,674 times
Reputation: 1392
I'm all for it. The GSP is a dangerous road with many curves and tree's very close alongside the road. Another problem I see is when it rains people don't reduce there speed. I'm seeing more and more roadside "memorials" pop up all the time.

I actually go out of my way to avoid the southbound stretch between 88 and 82. I get off at 88 and drive through the Silverton section of Toms River.

I think adding gaurd rails and reducing the speed will help. If it saves one life its well worth it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2008, 07:49 AM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,375 posts, read 20,790,034 times
Reputation: 9982
The only good news about speed limits are when they are increased. Speed limits are nothing more than a subversive way to reduce your liberty. Instead of speed limits, tickets should be dispensed based on careless or reckless driving violations. Someone going 80 mph in the middle lane for instance, in low traffic, is not going to cause as many accidents, for instance, as someone who is selfishly driving 50 mph in the left lane. Under this prescription, however, the former driver is in violation, the latter is not.

Speed limits exist primarily so municipalities can supplement their budgets on the backs of motorists. If the intent was to save lives, for instance, there would be none of the negotiating with the town prosecuting attorneys to drop the points violation aspect of the ticket. This merely waives the points, but the town still wants that money of yours. The intent is not to curtail your behavior, rather, the intent is to separate you from your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2008, 10:30 AM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,624,920 times
Reputation: 2435
"Someone going 80 mph in the middle lane for instance, in low traffic, is not going to cause as many accidents, for instance, as someone who is selfishly driving 50 mph in the left lane. Under this prescription, however, the former driver is in violation, the latter is not."

I agree that the person in the left lane is much more likely to cause an accident (and is a selfish jerk), but can't they be charged with a moving violation for doing so as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2008, 11:52 AM
 
Location: High Bridge
2,736 posts, read 9,667,895 times
Reputation: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJmmadude View Post
I agree that the person in the left lane is much more likely to cause an accident (and is a selfish jerk), but can't they be charged with a moving violation for doing so as well?
No.

There is no "under the limit" violation in the state of NJ:

State of New Jersey - Motor Vehicle Commission

and its unlikely an officer would get away with giving someone a careless or unsafe driving ticket who is under the speed limit by 5mph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2008, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA/Lk Hopatcong NJ
13,401 posts, read 28,717,395 times
Reputation: 12062
I hate that stretch of the parkway.
The lanes also seem very narrow..like in order to gain another lane they just made the existing ones smaller..I drive Interstate 80 every day and take it hands down over the parkway, especially that stretch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2008, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA/Lk Hopatcong NJ
13,401 posts, read 28,717,395 times
Reputation: 12062
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJmmadude View Post
"Someone going 80 mph in the middle lane for instance, in low traffic, is not going to cause as many accidents, for instance, as someone who is selfishly driving 50 mph in the left lane. Under this prescription, however, the former driver is in violation, the latter is not."

I agree that the person in the left lane is much more likely to cause an accident (and is a selfish jerk), but can't they be charged with a moving violation for doing so as well?
I always thought the left lane was a passing lane not a traveling lane
Failure to keep right would be one ticket they could write
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top