Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who Should Pay For New Hudson River Rail Tunnels?
Federal government 4 12.50%
State of New Jersey 4 12.50%
New York State 6 18.75%
Evenly divided between all of the above. 12 37.50%
Federal government should shoulder the majority of costs. 12 37.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2015, 04:10 PM
 
31,897 posts, read 26,926,466 times
Reputation: 24789

Advertisements

Past few weeks has seen much hot air and some action from the Obama administration (casting about for a legacy infrastructure project is a favourite of lame duck POTUS) over the Hudson River Tunnel project.

Governor Christie from the campaign trail somewhat reversed previous position and is "open" to the idea of new tunnels, long as NJ isn't stuck with the entire bill. Across the river Cuomo isn't having any of it and says NJ, Amtrak, and or the federal government needs to pony up solid big money and not just loans as the tunnels "aren't his (NYS's) main worry and benefit mostly Amtrak and NJT.

Eagar to get some sort of action going federal transportation secretary Mr. Foxx called a sit down (from which Cuomo was absent) to see if there could be a meeting of the minds.

Long story short the Gateway Project would cost an estimated 20 billion USD. If the last major infrastructure project carried out by a state is any guide (the Big Dig in Boston) that surely is a low ball number.

Everyone agrees the Hudson River Tunnels are way past their sell by date. Super Storm Sandy hastened the rotting process to the point Amtrak soon *must* not if begin major repairs on both tubes. Question is who is going to pony up for the job?

NJ rail commuters frustrated by delays to NYC=
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2015, 05:38 PM
 
1,069 posts, read 1,253,976 times
Reputation: 989
We are a donor state by a long shot, NY collects our tax money, and this is an interstate project. Feds should pick up most if not all, and NY should pick up the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 06:05 PM
 
31,897 posts, read 26,926,466 times
Reputation: 24789
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfrex View Post
We are a donor state by a long shot, NY collects our tax money, and this is an interstate project. Feds should pick up most if not all, and NY should pick up the rest.
Yeabut the feds already have pumped major funding into three of the most recent NYS/NYC rail projects:

The Farley USPS office conversion to the "New" Penn Station
Eastside Access for LIRR
Second Avenue Subway

The NYS MTA is sniffing around for funding to deal with their next capital improvement scheme including the next phase of the SAS. Three guesses who they are hoping will play Santa Claus (again).

On the other side of the tracks NJ has funded the Lackawanna Cutoff project but only just.
Commuter train: NJ progressing, while 'plans in Pa. have not left station' - News Wire - poconorecord.com - Stroudsburg, PA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 06:33 PM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,139,900 times
Reputation: 4562
Why does this project have to fall on the taxpayers? Why aren't Amtrak and NJ Transit footing some of the bill. They are constantly raising ticket prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 07:32 PM
 
31,897 posts, read 26,926,466 times
Reputation: 24789
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
Why does this project have to fall on the taxpayers? Why aren't Amtrak and NJ Transit footing some of the bill. They are constantly raising ticket prices.

Most if not all the major railroad ROW/infrastructure in the USA was built by the then privately owned railroads. As they vanished or shrunk things were either pulled up, abandoned, sold, repurposed and or currently used if not by the original RR itself whomever succeeded it in operations.

Amtrak is not the great Pennsylvania RR. It inherited much of that now bankrupt RR's ROW/infrastructure (along with New York Central) up along the Northeast from Washington D.C. to Maine. What Amtrak does not have is a dedicated constant stream of funding to do big infrastructure projects.

Unlike say the former Pennsylvania RR Amtrak cannot issue debt (bonds) to raise revenue. There is a pot of federal money ($35 billion at last count) that could be tapped. Federal loan could get new Hudson River rail tunnel built | NJ.com

Also if NYS and NJ agree to fund the projects they each have agencies who could apply for federal grants/funding that Amtrak cannot. The Port Authority of NY and NJ can raise funds by issuing debt without going before taxpayers as well.

Here is a link to how the defunct ARC project costs broke down:http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/200...der_the_h.html

Problem is the only American companies that could possibly finance such an infrastructure project aren't railroads, but things like Apple, Google, and so forth.

Last edited by BugsyPal; 08-22-2015 at 07:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 07:36 PM
 
Location: MMU->ABE->ATL->ASH
9,317 posts, read 20,993,806 times
Reputation: 10443
X None of the above, The users, A "Toll" should be charged to the trains that run thru it, and revenue anticipation bonds, should be issued to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 07:36 PM
 
Location: NJ
378 posts, read 586,463 times
Reputation: 439
NJ pays for bridges to nowhere in Alaska, dams in Tennessee, and Everglades projects in Florida. Why shouldn't the rest of the country send some spondulix our way?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2015, 09:07 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,201,005 times
Reputation: 10894
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Long story short the Gateway Project would cost an estimated 20 billion USD. If the last major infrastructure project carried out by a state is any guide (the Big Dig in Boston) that surely is a low ball number.
That's basically what Christie said about ARC.

Quote:
Everyone agrees the Hudson River Tunnels are way past their sell by date. Super Storm Sandy hastened the rotting process to the point Amtrak soon *must* not if begin major repairs on both tubes. Question is who is going to pony up for the job?
Christie should propose transferring ownership of the NEC from Trenton to NYC over to New Jersey Transit, then NJ ponies up. Oh yeah, and from that point on Amtrak pays for transit and NJT gets priority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 03:57 AM
 
1,069 posts, read 1,253,976 times
Reputation: 989
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
Why does this project have to fall on the taxpayers? Why aren't Amtrak and NJ Transit footing some of the bill. They are constantly raising ticket prices.
ALL passenger rail systems are subsidized. None are fully funded through ticket sales. NJ Transit is the least subsidized mass transit agency in the region, if not the country. And the subsidy continues to fall, which means fare increases are mostly to offset declining revenue sources in the budget. Also the alternative is risky - too high a fare and people will switch to bus or driving and eventually move to a different state. Again, if you make NJ Transit tickets carry the full cost, it will make LIRR and MTA comparably inexpensive and push people out of state. Westchester, Staten Island, Long Island, and NYC COMBINED do not have the housing stock or transit capacity to deal with a major influx of NJ residents fleeing. Transit is a delicate balance in a region and tax collection and disbursement in this region is a joke.

If the project was built tomorrow and the bill was due, even if the feds picked up every penny, we'd still be a donor state that year. Our annual contribution to the feds has ranged from $10 to $30 billion annually since 1985.

If the feds gave NJ a ONE YEAR tax holiday, in other words every dollar sent to the federal govt from NJ residents is credited back to the NJ state government, we could build the tunnel, pay down some debt, and make a sizable catch up payment to the pension. Our debt service would decline and the budget would be under significantly less pressure to make other investments in the state, such as road upgrades and tax incentives to build business enclaves in OUR cities.

1 year of tax relief from the feds and we can make 100 year improvements to infrastructure plus take steps to strengthening the budget.
2 years of tax relief from the feds and we fund 50% of the state's debt obligations freeing up a billion annually in the state budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 06:36 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,379,327 times
Reputation: 12004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
Why does this project have to fall on the taxpayers? Why aren't Amtrak and NJ Transit footing some of the bill. They are constantly raising ticket prices.
Because just like roads and bridges, tunnels are part of the US interstate transportation system.

Fed pays for the tunnel and Amtrak tracks

NJ pays for connection to Amtrak tracks

NY pays for connection to Amtrak tracks

All railroads using the tunnel to pay user fees.

I'd rather my taxes go to a tunnel than another aircraft carrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top