Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2016, 09:50 AM
 
13 posts, read 21,452 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

While researching NJ towns I've noticed that home prices don't always reflect the incomes of their town. For example Hanover township has a median home price of $467,500 and a median family income of $115,000. Meanwhile, other towns like Rockaway township have a median home price of $320,000 and a median family income of $111,000. It seems illogical that a family earning an extra 4,000 a year could afford a home for almost $150,000 more. Another example is Boonton with a median family income of $89,000 and a median home price of 335,000. I figured it would make for an interesting discussion. What are your theories as to why this disparity exists?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2016, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
4,031 posts, read 3,644,565 times
Reputation: 5860
Probably a combination of the following things:

- inherited money for a large down payment
- sold the previous home at a large profit allowing them to put a large down payment
- inherited the home itself
- people living in the house for many years prior to the housing boom when home prices were more in line with median income
- people flat out overextending themselves

Or maybe we're just in another bubble and we're gearing up for some declines in real estate prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2016, 03:06 AM
 
74 posts, read 73,977 times
Reputation: 70
I wonder the same thing. Most homes in decent North Jersey towns start at around 450-500K. Are people really making that much money, assuming their following the "2x-2.5x yearly income" rule?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2016, 05:49 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,259,695 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southbound16 View Post
I wonder the same thing. Most homes in decent North Jersey towns start at around 450-500K. Are people really making that much money, assuming their following the "2x-2.5x yearly income" rule?
I think most people consider 3X income to be the rule, but I always thought that was too high. 2X is smarter. But I don't think 450 or 500 is out of reach for 2 income families. There are many people in NJ making $100k. Put two of them together, let them save up a few years for a down payment or trade up from a smaller home, and they are all set to buy their 500k home.

Last edited by AnesthesiaMD; 08-16-2016 at 07:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2016, 07:14 AM
 
510 posts, read 500,756 times
Reputation: 1297
Unless the two towns are identical in every way (transportation and distance to the city, school district quality, home size, general town services) there is no way to guess why one place has a higher home value vs another, even with identical medium incomes. Does one down have an area prone to flooding? Well that might explain the cheaper house costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2016, 06:28 PM
 
229 posts, read 251,296 times
Reputation: 238
The 2x or 3x annual income guideline doesn't really apply anymore. Perhaps it did in the days of 8-12% interest rates. Does anyone really think a family with a household income of $200k can only afford up to only $600k? Besides, it's what you fiance that determines affordability, not total purchase price. If you put 20% down on a $500k house, that's only a $400k mortgage. At 3.92% interest for 30 years that's less than $1900 a month (of course NJ property taxes can easily add another $1k or more a month). That is easily affordable for a household earning $115k a year - that's $9500 a month before taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2016, 06:53 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,259,695 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig-D View Post
The 2x or 3x annual income guideline doesn't really apply anymore. Perhaps it did in the days of 8-12% interest rates. Does anyone really think a family with a household income of $200k can only afford up to only $600k? Besides, it's what you fiance that determines affordability, not total purchase price. If you put 20% down on a $500k house, that's only a $400k mortgage. At 3.92% interest for 30 years that's less than $1900 a month (of course NJ property taxes can easily add another $1k or more a month). That is easily affordable for a household earning $115k a year - that's $9500 a month before taxes.
Housing crisis anyone?

That is $6500 a month after federal, FICA and state taxes. $3000 for mortgage and escrow.

Leaving you $3500 a month for upkeep, utilities, IRA contributions, food, childcare, 2 car payments, car insurance and maintenance, health care, vacations, etc. And if one spouse loses a job, you are in real trouble.

Sure, you could do it, but you will be house poor and living paycheck to paycheck. A much smarter person at that salary would buy a cheaper home, and maybe even...I don't know...invest some of the money they saved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2016, 07:19 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,220,925 times
Reputation: 10895
Mine was 3.5X when I bought it, and I didn't sell my previous house first. You do what you gotta do; houses at 2.5X were clearly not acceptable. Hey, WaMu said 4-5X :-).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2016, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
4,031 posts, read 3,644,565 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
Mine was 3.5X when I bought it, and I didn't sell my previous house first. You do what you gotta do; houses at 2.5X were clearly not acceptable. Hey, WaMu said 4-5X :-).

And we all know what happened with WaMu...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2016, 07:24 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,220,925 times
Reputation: 10895
Quote:
Originally Posted by HudsonCoNJ View Post
And we all know what happened with WaMu...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xECUrlnXCqk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top