Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:04 AM
 
1,384 posts, read 1,751,064 times
Reputation: 1846

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Informed Info View Post
Is the proposed bill saying the following?:

Let's say Rick is a valet who receives an hourly wage of $8.60, the New Jersey minimum wage. During an hour long scheduled shift, Rick receives $7.00 in tips.

For that hour, Rick's employer can credit $6.47 of the received tips against Rick's hourly wage of $8.60, so they will only pay $2.13 in cash wages for that hour. However, including both the cash wage and the $7.00 in tips received, Rick's total earnings are $9.00.

In the next hour of his shift, Rick receives no tips. Because no tips were received to be credited against the minimum wage, the employer must pay Rick $8.60 in cash wages for this hour.
No, that’s the way the current system works. The proposed bill would make it possible for, in that first hour, instead of Rick earning $9.13 (not $9.00), the employer can instead just pay Rick $8.60, the minimum wage, and pocket the tip for himself or herself if he or she chooses.

$0.53 cents an hour lost by Rick as a result. It could be much worse for servers working in higher end restaurants with higher bills, who could make $20 an hour in tips and could instead now see that all lost and still only make $8.60 for the hour.

Part of me feels that in more extreme cases, restaurant owners wouldn’t be doing stuff like that because word would spread quickly, servers would quit, and no one would want to work there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2018, 12:54 PM
 
3,305 posts, read 3,864,277 times
Reputation: 2590
Word would spread quickly to whom? The secret waiters webpages where they all discuss tips? Anytime I've been hired to work at a place it takes some time before people generally open up about their financials.

Frankly, some people are desperate, maybe they're leaving an abusive spouse, and feel like the $8.60 is all they can get so they take it. Doesn't make it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 02:31 PM
 
1,384 posts, read 1,751,064 times
Reputation: 1846
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaymoney View Post
Word would spread quickly to whom? The secret waiters webpages where they all discuss tips? Anytime I've been hired to work at a place it takes some time before people generally open up about their financials.

Frankly, some people are desperate, maybe they're leaving an abusive spouse, and feel like the $8.60 is all they can get so they take it. Doesn't make it right.
I would think, or at least hope, that if people who were making $20 an hour and all of the sudden now notice it is only $8.60, which is obviously a huge difference, would start making noise one way or another. The move is akin to highway robbery. If all of the sudden, you noticed you are making half as much as before for the same amount of work, don’t you think you would be outraged and start telling people about how you are getting screwed over? I can’t see masses of tipped workers all remaining collectively silent if this starts happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 03:23 PM
 
3,305 posts, read 3,864,277 times
Reputation: 2590
You'd think so, but how much outcry have you heard from Indiana Carrier workers about being outsourced? A brief blip a few weeks ago and you hadn't thought about it until just now.

So they can talk about it but they need to have people listening. Right now when wages get cut, $15 an hour seems like too much, or unions get smashed everyone says "well, I don't earn that much, they shouldn't either!" instead of the more appropriate "If they make that much I deserve more for my labor too!"

It used to be said that a rising tide lifted all boats but now everyone's worried about falling off their tiny lifeboat they're pushing others into the water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 06:18 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,201,005 times
Reputation: 10894
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaymoney View Post
It used to be said that a rising tide lifted all boats but now everyone's worried about falling off their tiny lifeboat they're pushing others into the water.
If everyone gets paid more, you just get inflation and no one is paid more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:26 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,252,518 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leps12 View Post
No, that’s the way the current system works. The proposed bill would make it possible for, in that first hour, instead of Rick earning $9.13 (not $9.00), the employer can instead just pay Rick $8.60, the minimum wage, and pocket the tip for himself or herself if he or she chooses.

$0.53 cents an hour lost by Rick as a result. It could be much worse for servers working in higher end restaurants with higher bills, who could make $20 an hour in tips and could instead now see that all lost and still only make $8.60 for the hour.

Part of me feels that in more extreme cases, restaurant owners wouldn’t be doing stuff like that because word would spread quickly, servers would quit, and no one would want to work there.
I should have done a little more research before asking - got Rick's example from another board discussing the issue. Went to minimumwage.org website a little while ago & saw Rick the Valet is indeed the current example.

https://www.minimum-wage.org/new-jer...e-minimum-wage

I don't think it would be smart for restaurant owners to do this.

I waited tables in college (out of state & back in the early part of the 90's) at a busy family restaurant (Italian/German food). The restaurant was located in between a major mall & a movie theater. Always busy & everyone made more than decent money in tips. This is why you had to "know someone" to get a job at this place.

Provide great service with a smile...but turn your tables over, without rushing people. It behooves both the server & the restaurant owners to do so.

To keep servers' tips & pay minimum wage? It will only behoove the restaurant to have tables turned over quickly, not the server. Good luck with that. There are other minimum wage jobs where one isn't running around on their feet for 6 or 8 hour shifts, doesn't have to deal with "picky" or demanding customers/annoying children/messes/hot kitchens that are chaotic when super busy/idiot chefs or cooks with attitudes (and they ain't Gordon Ramsey), etc. I guess someone would either really have to LOVE being a server or have no other options as far as min. wage jobs go. I wouldn't do it for min. wage. No thanks!

Last edited by Informed Info; 02-13-2018 at 07:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top