Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The way that they did that was very irresponsible. There's no good reason why they couldn't have spread out a bit or worn masks of some sort. They showed a complete lack of respect or concern for their fellow New Jerseyans. They don't care about the people who they may infect or have to care for them in a hospital. If their relative or friend hasn't become seriously ill or died, it means nothing to them.
Well honey, I spent the day chasing innocent people out of public parks.
They live for this stuff. They get to boss people around who have damn near zero chance of harming them, unlike a domestic call or even a traffic stop. The only thing better for them is smashing in a bridegroom's face for holding a wedding, and seeing the look in the bride's eyes as her day is ruined forever.
The way that they did that was very irresponsible. There's no good reason why they couldn't have spread out a bit or worn masks of some sort.
That would rather have defeated the purpose. You don't demonstrate your objection to a policy by following it scrupulously; that shows lack of conviction.
That would rather have defeated the purpose. You don't demonstrate your objection to a policy by following it scrupulously; that shows lack of conviction.
It would have shown that they know how to respect someone's personal space and not throw the masses back into a lockdown. That display of idiocy only makes things worse.
It would have shown that they know how to respect someone's personal space and not throw the masses back into a lockdown. That display of idiocy only makes things worse.
No, it makes things better. The more people protesting this tyranny, the more pressure is put on the tyrants to loosen their grips on the reins. I'll risk getting the flu for that.
That would rather have defeated the purpose. You don't demonstrate your objection to a policy by following it scrupulously; that shows lack of conviction.
If you’re objective to the state being closed, wearing masks helps your objective. The argument should be let’s reopen with masks and six foot distance. It’s when your agenda has nothing to do with re-opening and everything about blind resistance that you’d ignore the very things that would allow the economy to reopen. This is more about politics and people itching for a fight. Bunch of children saying “ you can’t tell me what to do”, and are part of the problem not the solution.
if you’re objective to the state being closed, wearing masks helps your objective. The argument should be let’s reopen with masks and six foot distance. It’s when your agenda has nothing to do with re-opening and everything about blind resistance that you’d ignore the very things that would allow the economy to reopen. This is more about politics and people itching for a fight. Bunch of children saying “ you can’t tell me what to do”, and are part of the problem not the solution.
+1
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
