Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well I'm not happy with either choice, however, without a doubt I pick McCain over Obama. I would feel a lot safer with him at the helm than Obama. I don't think Obama's strong enough to handle Iran's president, will make Iraq even worse with no clear plan and various terrorists are waiting to see us cave and vote for him.
OK... I guess I am going to put on my armor, helmet and see if I can borrow Jersey Man's kevlar vest.
Yes. His is a name that is frequently mentioned as being on the short list of VP's for McCain.
Nicolem
he is helping Louisiana recover...I believe he had run once before but was defeated...they instead voted that bumbling idiot Blanco in...Nj parallels Louisiana in so many ways when it comes to politics just constantly voting the good ole boys back in office
I'm not thrilled with either one...guess McCain for me as I perceive him to be the lesser of 2 evils.
Obama's wife Michelle gives me the chills...she scares the hell out of me
Obama. Not that I'm a Republican or Democrat, but historically speaking our economy has done better with a Democrat in the White House.
Let your attacks begin...
he's not seasoned enough, especially global affairs, foreign policy
he has a loose cannon fruit loop for a wife and yes i do believe in "pillow talk"
I think many are waiting to see who he chooses for VP
Obama. Not that I'm a Republican or Democrat, but historically speaking our economy has done better with a Democrat in the White House.
Let your attacks begin...
Ill lead the attacks-
1st- The White House has a microscopic amount of control over the economy.
2nd- If you believe Government has alot to do with the economy check what party controlled Congress during those Utopian times when a Democrat was in the White House. i.e. 1995-2000.
Ill lead the attacks-
1st- The White House has a microscopic amount of control over the economy.
2nd- If you believe Government has alot to do with the economy check what party controlled Congress during those Utopian times when a Democrat was in the White House. i.e. 1995-2000.
Right,because in the 90s we had the lowest deficit we'd had in years.
I'm just ticked because we had 2 Bushes in the White House,why not 2 Clintons?
Ok we'll let them skip a term too then.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
