Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2009, 07:48 AM
 
1,983 posts, read 7,515,735 times
Reputation: 418

Advertisements

Home prices rise for 2nd month in a row - MarketWatch

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2009, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Canco, JC, NJ
229 posts, read 923,207 times
Reputation: 90
Before I even read the article, I want the first to post that:
YOY is down!
It is an error!
Prices are still too high!
The gubment is wrong for trying to shore up the economy!
and finally, THE SKY IS FALLING!

;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 07:59 AM
 
1,931 posts, read 3,412,618 times
Reputation: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by millsan1 View Post
Before I even read the article, I want the first to post that:
YOY is down!
It is an error!
Prices are still too high!
The gubment is wrong for trying to shore up the economy!
and finally, THE SKY IS FALLING!

;-)
No No you have it wrong. I want to be the very very first to say housing boom here we come!! LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:23 AM
 
744 posts, read 1,405,895 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoorestownResident View Post
Bizarre article.

Quote:
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The prices of single-family homes in 20 major cities rose a seasonally adjusted 1.4% in June, the second increase in a row after falling every month for three years, according to the Case-Shiller home price index released Tuesday by Standard & Poor's.
Except that the seasonally adjusted 20 city number didn't increase in May, so it's the first increase. And it increased by 0.7% not 1.4%.

The numbers actually being referred to are the unadjusted numbers. Seriously, how stupid do these writers think their readers are?

For NY we have two months of rises (in the non-SA numbers, the SA numbers are up too, though the article claims otherwise they aren't using them). And the June bump in the non-SA is bigger than the 2008 June bump (0.42% against 0.27%). Of course we have the rush to get in before a $8k grant expires (as we've seen in posts here) which numerous "bears" said would cause a small rise followed by a drop when it expires (of course the gov wants to double down instead now...).

For some perspective we are still under the March level. In fact a quick look at the numbers shows we had a spectacularly bad start of the year with CS levels falling twice as fast as they did in those months in 2008 (remember Nov 2008 was the bottom ). So year-to-date 2009 change is still worse (if you like overpriced real estate) than the same month year-to-date 2008 change.

So it's still wait and see for me. I do think real estate prices will spike up in the future, given everything the gov. is doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:35 AM
 
1,983 posts, read 7,515,735 times
Reputation: 418
It's only bizarre because it doesn't fit into your thesis. The data show increasing housing prices with a pickup in new and existing homes sales. Not rocket science really. Pure economics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:40 AM
 
1,983 posts, read 7,515,735 times
Reputation: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by millsan1 View Post
Before I even read the article, I want the first to post that:
YOY is down!
It is an error!
Prices are still too high!
The gubment is wrong for trying to shore up the economy!
and finally, THE SKY IS FALLING!

;-)
Absolutely. Shiller is the most bearish of the bears and even he says the turnaround is 'impressive'. Of course I successfully called bottom 6-9 months ago. And I'm just waiting for the posts that say - prices are STILL DOWN -4000% since last year!!!!!

Which has about as much to do with the subject as me posting what I had for breakfast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,273,731 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoorestownResident View Post
Absolutely. Shiller is the most bearish of the bears and even he says the turnaround is 'impressive'. Of course I successfully called bottom 6-9 months ago.
Of course you unsuccessfully called it for some time before then.

Have you heard the story of The boy who cried green shoots ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:45 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 3,952,723 times
Reputation: 277
I don't understand why people cheerlead for the market to crash and not recover unless they are in the housing hunt right now.

How would someone know when it's time to buy?

I feel like people really think they are waiting the 4 br center hall colonial in a great town that used to be 800K for 200K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,273,731 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoorestownResident View Post
It's only bizarre because it doesn't fit into your thesis. The data show increasing housing prices with a pickup in new and existing homes sales. Not rocket science really. Pure economics.
CS index futures market still suggests a slight drop, though the outlook is more bullish than it was a few months ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 08:49 AM
 
1,983 posts, read 7,515,735 times
Reputation: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
Of course you unsuccessfully called it for some time before then.

Have you heard the story of The boy who cried green shoots ?
Not true at all. I acknowledged a terrible bear market but still suggested it would end a lot sooner than consensus and I was exactly right. The evidence has been out there for a year or more, that's what I was posting about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top