Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2009, 12:56 PM
 
1,340 posts, read 3,698,092 times
Reputation: 451

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo99 View Post
no one should be forced out of a house they lived in for years because of property taxes. its not our fault that you decide to rent a 1 br apt in a crappy neighborhood
No one is forcing them out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2009, 12:57 PM
 
636 posts, read 1,423,939 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
rental property is also subject to taxation.

btw, an alternative is to lobby for special tax breaks for seniors. The rest of the town may be willing to deal with that for a number of reasons (the seniors don't have school-aged kids, and they don't commit crimes)
Not directly. And I wouldn't want a lobby for seniors; only to not directly tax property owners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 01:01 PM
 
636 posts, read 1,423,939 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by NatasNJ View Post
No one is forcing them out.
What happens if you don't pay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,798 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo99 View Post
no one should be forced out of a house they lived in for years because of property taxes.
Wrong on two counts:
(1) they aren't forced out, as I argued previously,
(2) the fact that you've lived there for years doesn't give you the right to keep living there.

Quote:
its not our fault that you decide to rent a 1 br apt in a crappy neighborhood
No, it's your fault that you want to stick your hand in my pocket.

It's not my fault that you or anyone else chose to live in a place where they can't afford to pay their property taxes.

If you want me to pay those property taxes, maybe you should move out of the neighborhood and let me move in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 08:39 PM
 
636 posts, read 1,423,939 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by gradstudent77 View Post
You do your best, but if you find that you can't make the payments then its time to move out or organize a political voting bloc that can take over the town and substantially lower taxes.
Ok, then by the same token, if you lose your job - tough luck, you should have budgeted for that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 09:14 PM
 
1,340 posts, read 3,698,092 times
Reputation: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Michigan Man View Post
Ok, then by the same token, if you lose your job - tough luck, you should have budgeted for that!
Yes you should budget for losing your job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,798 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Michigan Man View Post
Ok, then by the same token, if you lose your job - tough luck, you should have budgeted for that!
Absolutely.

I make a pretty decent living, and I think it would be more than a little unfair if the tax payers, many who earn less than I do, to be forced to continue to pay me my current salary if I lost my job.

The argument that there should be some kind of social safety net is not about granting everyone the right to maintain their present standard of living indefinitely, thereby granting them full immunity to the consequences of their actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 09:29 PM
 
636 posts, read 1,423,939 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
Absolutely.

I make a pretty decent living, and I think it would be more than a little unfair if the tax payers, many who earn less than I do, to be forced to continue to pay me my current salary if I lost my job.

The argument that there should be some kind of social safety net is not about granting everyone the right to maintain their present standard of living indefinitely, thereby granting them full immunity to the consequences of their actions.
I agree. But then why should only property owners pay for the entire town's services? Can't we shift towards a more user-based system? Or at least a system that includes renters as directly as property owners?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 11:25 PM
 
744 posts, read 1,406,381 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Michigan Man View Post
I agree. But then why should only property owners pay for the entire town's services? Can't we shift towards a more user-based system? Or at least a system that includes renters as directly as property owners?
Any landlord who doesn't set their rent to cover property taxes is an idiot. Hence, assuming non-idiot landlords renters do pay property taxes. In fact given that the landlord has to allow for the place being vacant on occasions (and hence charge enough to cover that time) renters are paying a higher proportion of property taxes when they are there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 05:20 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,798 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Michigan Man View Post
I agree. But then why should only property owners pay for the entire town's services?
The landlord already pays property tax, and passes the costs on to renters. If renters paid tax on top of that, that would be a double tax.

Quote:
Can't we shift towards a more user-based system?
Yes, but that would require a radical overhaul of the existing system (if you're doing a straight "user pays", why have public schools at all ?). Incremental steps such as vouchers would be more practical and less controversial.

Quote:
Or at least a system that includes renters as directly as property owners?
Because the town still wants to collect taxes when the place is vacant, or when the owner occupies it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top