Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-28-2010, 11:59 AM
 
1,938 posts, read 4,755,644 times
Reputation: 895

Advertisements

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/us/28mead.html

I'm not going to pretend to have any great insight into the complexities of this, but basically
Peter is being robbed to pay Paul... and that is unlikely to be something that can be continued
for very much longer..

"... the operating plan also lays out a proposal to prevent Lake Mead from dropping below the
trigger point. It allows water managers to send 40 percent more water than usual downstream
to Lake Mead from Lake Powell in Utah, the river’s other big reservoir, which now contains
about 50 percent more water than Lake Mead. In that case, the shortage declaration would be
avoided and Lake Mead’s levels restored to 1,100 feet or so.

Lake Powell, fed by rain and snow melt that create the Colorado and tributaries, has risen
more than 60 feet from a 2004 low because the upper basin states, Colorado, New Mexico,
Wyoming and Utah, do not use their full allocations. The upper basin provides a minimum
annual flow of 8.23 million acre feet to Arizona, Nevada and California. (An acre-foot of water is
generally considered the amount two families of four use annually.)"

FWIW
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2010, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Del Norte NM
529 posts, read 1,327,737 times
Reputation: 169
Good point. So why doesn't Colorado and Utah whine about delivering water to thristy Arizona and California the way it and NM cry about giving water to Texas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2010, 04:52 AM
 
Location: Abu Al-Qurq
3,689 posts, read 9,198,607 times
Reputation: 2992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziasforever View Post
Good point. So why doesn't Colorado and Utah whine about delivering water to thristy Arizona and California the way it and NM cry about giving water to Texas?
My best guess: different watersheds, different problems.

Most of NM and CO's populated and farming areas are E of the continental divide and are primarily linked up with Texas water supplies. Occasionally there's some cross-connect (San Juan/Chama) but NM's not very dependent on the Gila, San Juan, etc.

It would appear the Rio Grande is stretched far more than the Colorado.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top