Quote:
Originally Posted by vanwyck
So next time before dispensing what is essentially legal advice, read the law.
|
Thank you.
The thing is STOP posting as if you know! As if you have some special knowledge. Some special experience. Some special education. You do not.
People need facts! Not supposition, not conjecture, not what one pulls outta their *** based on some isolated experience.
****
The law states a reasonable period. What is reasonable is up to the judge. In which case, a couple of extra weeks is reasonanle.
That said, in your case, you have a written contract stating 30 days. Great!
The problem is how do you enforce the contract? What penalty is their for non-compliance?
This is your mistake. You s/h included a penalty clause. X amont per day blah blah. As it is the LL has little incentive.
Enforcement? The court system of course, but seeking remedy in a timely fashion is problematic, as its only a couple weeks time. So, it really isn't worth the effort.
What you did in making the contract you left yourself as the likely party seeking redress given the LL is out of town.
You could have simply not paid the last month's rent. Advising the LL to keep the security in lieu of. Of course, given both the rent and security are equal. Doing so puts the LL in the position of seeking redress. Of course, not exactly legal, but commonly done.
Patience.