
03-19-2012, 11:53 AM
|
|
|
270 posts, read 380,272 times
Reputation: 90
|
|
Thanks for all your input...I won the case !and I am relieved  
|

03-20-2012, 02:55 AM
|
|
|
99,907 posts, read 99,476,386 times
Reputation: 74044
|
|
just curious what your employers reasoning was?
|

03-20-2012, 07:27 AM
|
|
|
Location: Manhattan
24,939 posts, read 35,092,196 times
Reputation: 12425
|
|
Most employers when faced with even the possibility of getting benefits denied will lie about the cause of dismissal. It will stop only when penalties are applied to fraudulent employers. Merely granting the employee UC when the employee wins is NOT enough of a dissincentive to force an employer to behave honorably. When an empoyer LOSES such a case, he should be fined an amount EQUAL to the total employment conpensation the state needs to fork out, or perhaps double or treble that amouunt, That single regualtion would cut down the frivolous denials by employers to ZERO overnight.
This is not unlike landlords overcharging EVERY tenant newly renting a rent-regulated apartment. If the only penalty is the reinstatement of the LEGAL rent, there is no disincentive to landlord fraud.
If criminal behavior is not punished, it is in the criminals best financial interests to behave criminally. It's almost a truism.
|

03-24-2012, 10:19 PM
|
|
|
270 posts, read 380,272 times
Reputation: 90
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
just curious what your employers reasoning was?
|
They claimed that i missed 3 days of work and i "just didnt show up". They also lied about the dates that I was out from work . I was stunned to say the least at the amount of lies  But I had all my documentation and I proved them wrong but it was very hurtful that this same employer who i had previously worked for would turn out to be so heartless.
|

03-25-2012, 05:04 AM
|
|
|
99,907 posts, read 99,476,386 times
Reputation: 74044
|
|
thats why as i said earlier its important for employers to really do much better jobs spelling out greater detail on what sick days are, how they can be used and what the penaltys are for lying.
they need to require notes as to why you were out so it documents things on both sides.
one of the things my son does as an attorney is re-write corporate manuals and the most problematic area he says is sick days as they are spelled out in manuals . since they arent benefits that have be offered there are no rules so companies botch how they handle them all the time.
they just dont tie in to the family medical leave act well at all most of the time and leave the employer either breaking the law, trying to lie to cover their butts or defenseless in court.
|

03-25-2012, 09:56 AM
|
|
|
Location: Manhattan
24,939 posts, read 35,092,196 times
Reputation: 12425
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzyj19
They claimed that i missed 3 days of work and i "just didnt show up". They also lied about the dates that I was out from work . I was stunned to say the least at the amount of lies  But I had all my documentation and I proved them wrong but it was very hurtful that this same employer who i had previously worked for would turn out to be so heartless.
|
jazzy,
Good for you. It worked just as I thought it would, even with the employers typical and shoddy "excuse." "My employee QUIT without notice!"
Did it go as far as an administrative judge?
Isn't it a shame that there is nonprovision for penalizing the lying sleazeball?
A lesson I learned: follow up ALL phone calls with a confirmatory e-mail starting with "As I told you in my phone call of this morning, March 25, blah, blah, blah."
|

03-26-2012, 10:47 AM
|
|
|
270 posts, read 380,272 times
Reputation: 90
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kefir King
jazzy,
Good for you. It worked just as I thought it would, even with the employers typical and shoddy "excuse." "My employee QUIT without notice!"
Did it go as far as an administrative judge?
Isn't it a shame that there is nonprovision for penalizing the lying sleazeball?
A lesson I learned: follow up ALL phone calls with a confirmatory e-mail starting with "As I told you in my phone call of this morning, March 25, blah, blah, blah."
|
No it didn't go as far as an administrative judge. I'm glad it didn't go that far but it wouldn't have gone well either had they tried that because they LIED and they would have been found out either way. It's sad that they stooped that low but it opened my eyes to who exactly I had been working for all those years. I'm glad that I kept all my paper work !
|

03-26-2012, 03:38 PM
|
|
|
12,119 posts, read 32,452,423 times
Reputation: 3852
|
|
kefir king could you explain about the above stuff about employers lying and getting fined. i didn't read the whole thread. sounds like news to me. do you mean an employer will lie about the circumstances in which the employee was terminated to make it look the employee engaged in misconduct so they won't get benefits? never heard of the employer getting fined part of it
|

03-26-2012, 03:43 PM
|
|
|
Location: Long Island, NY
7,844 posts, read 12,706,466 times
Reputation: 9245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
thats why as i said earlier its important for employers to really do much better jobs spelling out greater detail on what sick days are, how they can be used and what the penaltys are for lying.
they need to require notes as to why you were out so it documents things on both sides.
one of the things my son does as an attorney is re-write corporate manuals and the most problematic area he says is sick days as they are spelled out in manuals . since they arent benefits that have be offered there are no rules so companies botch how they handle them all the time.
they just dont tie in to the family medical leave act well at all most of the time and leave the employer either breaking the law, trying to lie to cover their butts or defenseless in court.
|
Regarding the bolded, that may vary on a state to state basis and possibly company basis. I work for a very large global bank and I can tell you, the company does not require it but a manager may "ask" for it. Medical leave is very private and no one has the right to ask other than if you are going out on disability or compensation. The only person who can ask details of the illness is the comp or disability company. I had an issue with an employee regarding sick time and doctor appointments. HR made it extremely clear that it's none of my or even my manager's business. If I call in sick, I technically do not need to give the details of my illness other than I am sick.
|

03-26-2012, 04:27 PM
|
|
|
99,907 posts, read 99,476,386 times
Reputation: 74044
|
|
there are lots of buts to the above. . ada vs sick day notes is very complex and is one of the reasons employee manuals and policies have to be written by experts in that area.
the landmark case making sick day notes questionable in ny in 2003 was the basis for a lower court ruling in ohio. the lower court in ohio sided with ny.
a federal court in ohio reversed the lower court decision last year..
in 2003 a ny trial court ruling in connroy vs the dept of corrections said anything exposing disabilities in a worker if it didnt effect the job is a no no.
a similiar case in a lower court in ohio adopted the same view.
in 2011 a federal court dis-agreed and threw out the ohio lower court decsion.
im no lawyer but to me i see that that can make future cases here in ny very complex and slippery as no one knows what a federal court that sits over ny will decide since a sister federal court basically threw out the ny verdict by overturning its brother in ohio,....
very interesting reading on the topic
Jackson Lewis LLP | Workplace Resource Center | City May Require Doctor’s Note from Workers Returning from Sick Leave, Federal Court Rules
Last edited by mathjak107; 03-26-2012 at 04:49 PM..
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|