Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2012, 12:21 AM
 
Location: NY,NY
2,896 posts, read 9,775,763 times
Reputation: 2074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by checkmatechamp13 View Post
That's not necessarily true. Distance to Midtown & Downtown Manhattan plays a role in the rent prices. For the price you're paying to live in a dodgy part of Upper Manhattan, you could potentially live in a perfectly safe neighborhood in Staten Island. The problem of course, is the commute.
Well, SI might be a part of planet Earth, but it is not a part of the typical Transplant conversation.

"Distance" isn't what truly matters, DESIREABILITY is the absolute factor!!!!

The more desireable a place, the greater the Demand, the greater the Demand, the greater the cost. Plain, basic, economics.

SI isn't comparably cheap because it is distant, it is because their is a low desireability. For some, the distance might be an issue, for *more* the place itself, and many of the sort that live there are what makes SI undesireable.

For example, my GF grew up there and would not move back for anything in the world! Zero cost housing and absolute safety would not be enough. In her experience it was a horrible place.

So, the problem, of course is MORE than simply the commute.

Do you think people choose Fort Greene, Clinton Hill or say Prospect Heights, Williamsburg or Greenpoint rather than SI, becaue of the commute?!

The draw to such places is far more than the shorter commute. Plus who would want to live next door to 'Big Ang' or Wu-Tang for that matter....

Not a desireable proposition even if the commute were short.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2012, 11:15 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
3,921 posts, read 9,089,400 times
Reputation: 1670
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcoltrane View Post
SI isn't comparably cheap because it is distant, it is because their is a low desireability. For some, the distance might be an issue, for *more* the place itself, and many of the sort that live there are what makes SI undesireable.

Do you think people choose Fort Greene, Clinton Hill or say Prospect Heights, Williamsburg or Greenpoint rather than SI, becaue of the commute?!

The draw to such places is far more than the shorter commute. Plus who would want to live next door to 'Big Ang' or Wu-Tang for that matter....

Not a desireable proposition even if the commute were short.
You really think all of SI is populated by gang members and people from the mafia? Any serious gang issues are concentrated in certain pockets, and for the mafia, I'm sure they're still around, but unless you're involved with them, you don't have anything to worry about.

Yes, the commute plays a large role in prices because people want as short a commute as possible. I don't find anything desirable about Bushwick aside from the commute. You have more to worry about in most of Bushwick than in 95% of SI neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top