Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know why you have to be a martyr in order to be considered a liberal now a days. People keep moving to extremes, there no middle ground anymore.
I don't know why you have to be a martyr in order to be considered a liberal now a days. People keep moving to extremes, there no middle ground anymore.
I'm not sure what you're referring too. When has there been a "middle" ground? What makes the US do dynamic is that politics (as well as the politics of economics) tend to swing from one end to another fairly rapidly.
I'm not sure what you're referring too. When has there been a "middle" ground? What makes the US do dynamic is that politics (as well as the politics of economics) tend to swing from one end to another fairly rapidly.
Before Bill Clinton came a long, democrats were not winning elections due to far liberal policies. He was the first one that comes to mind in terms of being moderate with social liberal tendencies (Obama is similar).
I don't know why you have to be a martyr in order to be considered a liberal now a days. People keep moving to extremes, there no middle ground anymore.
Liberals aren't even liberal anymore. In many cases conservatives are more liberal than self-proclaimed liberals themselves.
Liberals aren't even liberal anymore. In many cases conservatives are more liberal than self-proclaimed liberals themselves.
Many conservatives are more "libertarian" than many liberals.
(Except for abortion: they tend not to believe in free choice or lack of governmental control in that area.)
When you are that ridiculously wealthy, you shouldn't be able to pick and choose what charity to donate to. You should be taxed instead, simply to allocate your funds equitably. Otherwise you can wield far too much power over us regular people.
They are taxed. But they still have lots of money, and it is their choice entirely to give it to whatever charity they chose or to be honest they don't have to donate at all.
There is never away to 100% allocate resources equally, and there never would be. What you just said taken to it's ultimate conclusion is communism.
Before Bill Clinton came a long, democrats were not winning elections due to far liberal policies. He was the first one that comes to mind in terms of being moderate with social liberal tendencies (Obama is similar).
I don't know why you have to be a martyr in order to be considered a liberal now a days. People keep moving to extremes, there no middle ground anymore.
Due to political polarization, plus the rise of social justice warriors. Though the social justice warriors got a huge blow with the election of Trump, and that the fact despite all of Trump's issues, there's no clear Democratic contender in 2020.
Many conservatives are more "libertarian" than many liberals.
(Except for abortion: they tend not to believe in free choice or lack of governmental control in that area.)
Most conservatives are far from libertarian. Evidence of that being the fact that most conservatives support stop and frisk and most will support war.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
