Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, then, I guess they won their eviction case. Or I hope they did--locking out a tenant prior to getting an order for eviction would cost your co-op big-time in the end.
Once the RS moved out, dies, whatever, it then becomes de-stabilzed or controleed and the ownership of the sponsor (the LL) he then rents the unsold apartments at market rate.
Only a certain percentage of the apartments in our building have been sold, most likley enough to make it co-op, thus losing the RC RS laws once the RS RC tenant leaves. Out of the 32 apartments, Mr X, and one other tenant are RS, so now Mr X is dead and there is now only one RS tenant, the rest are owned and market rate rentals.
so, just waiting for Friday........................
Well, then, I guess they won their eviction case. Or I hope they did--locking out a tenant prior to getting an order for eviction would cost your co-op big-time in the end.
they know the right laws regarding these types of problems, they own many buildings and Im sure this isnt the first time a situation like this has occured. here, yes, this was the first, but the LL did everything all legal.
Wait the daughter let go of the apartment ? Wow you would think she would move in herself . $400 is cheap
1 - She didn't really let go of the apartment, she hadnt lived there in over a decade....as she is married and has her own home. Why would she want to go back/ for 400.00?
It wasnt her apartment anyway, it was her parents, plus, i think she has a house anyway. I have not seen her since the funeral.
so we will see what happens, Im thinking they are nt going to vacate friday and the marhsll is going to come, give them the 20 minute toi collect important papers and then padlock the door.
my building is co-op, the man on the 3rd floor died (John) in the summer, he had 2 other men there taking are of him, in return for them to live somewhere, anyway John had died and the daughter told the LL I'm done here do what ever you have to.
...
Why wasn't it a straight forward removal on the basis that they were caregivers and the person they were caring for no longer lived in the home? They were never tenants, they were doing a job.
Or were they paid? Were they paid to look after the gentleman, or were they hovering like vultures waiting for him to die? If they were not paid, I think they were living there, and then it's a different scenario than caregiver in terms of removal.
Was there a Will, or did the caregivers sort out his stuff?
Did any of the caregivers have access to the gentleman's bank accounts?
Degenerate scumbags who’ve failed at life. Pathetic.
Damn you don't even know these people.....They are elderly men and who knows what kind of curve balls life has thrown at them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
