Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Paper use is down precisely because no one else is banning plastic bags. If other cities adopt it or there is a country-wide ban, it would be an environmental disaster.
Just like if you banned factory farming due to animal cruelty. Maybe a smallish city like SF doing it is fine, but if people do it en masse it would lead to either food shortages or massive environmental consequences as more land would need to be converted into farms. If China, US, and India ban plastic bags, there are no amount of logging ops planting 2 trees or whatever that would compensate for the surge and the sheer volume of paper needed. So replacing plastic with paper is just virtue signaling and is not an environmentally sustainable policy.
So obviously you have stats to back up your claim that paper bags replacing plastic bags would result in X% worldwide increase in paper production
Just get a little flip and tumble bag that balls up into itself and stick it in your regular bag. $10-$12, lasts several years. Wide range of colors to choose from.
For paper v plastic debate, I urge you to carefully read this recent NYT article. I also thought that paper is better for the environment but I’ve learned a few things, like:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.