Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,477,629 times
Reputation: 5828

Advertisements

nyc should have train to planes that go both to grand central, penn station, and maybe even straight to secuacus
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:29 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,701,807 times
Reputation: 25616
I actually feel they should move the Airport to Staten Island. I refuse to land at LGA because if you seen what the pilot has to do it is very risky. They have a very short room and time to land the plane. Not to mention the noise in the area. Staten Island would be much easier and safer for airplanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:40 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,202 posts, read 7,223,380 times
Reputation: 17473
^ No go for SI. Too close to EWR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:49 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,202 posts, read 7,223,380 times
Reputation: 17473
Since Rikers will soon be available, maybe the PA can take over and expand LGA on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,633 posts, read 18,222,068 times
Reputation: 34509
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
I actually feel they should move the Airport to Staten Island. I refuse to land at LGA because if you seen what the pilot has to do it is very risky. They have a very short room and time to land the plane. Not to mention the noise in the area. Staten Island would be much easier and safer for airplanes.
Pills seem to stick the landing hundreds of thousands of times a year at least without incident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,569 posts, read 84,777,093 times
Reputation: 115083
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Since Rikers will soon be available, maybe the PA can take over and expand LGA on it.
I said that as a joke back in 2012 when they officially started the procurement process for the new Terminal B project, and it turns out someone actually had already come up with a detailed plan to do just that. I bet they will, eventually.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,569 posts, read 84,777,093 times
Reputation: 115083
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
^ No go for SI. Too close to EWR.
Way too close.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2019, 09:34 PM
 
3,861 posts, read 3,152,073 times
Reputation: 4237
Something needs to give at laguardia. Keeps cabbies in business,keeps jobs, but traffic stinks.
Any rail service should run along the GCP,and merge with the Astoria train before the bridge. Broadway local,no?

Or along the BQE for 74th street tramsfer.

That LIRR link is a must for people coming from the east, so willets point is more logical. Also gives the city another reason to sell off parkland from the junkyard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:08 AM
 
43,659 posts, read 44,385,284 times
Reputation: 20558
Quote:
Originally Posted by iammax View Post
I'm against this, becuase it's another obtuse separate system like the JFK monorail. Bring the NW train directly to Laguardia and bring the A or JZ train directly to JFK.
Since JFK already has an airtrain, they are not going to extend a subway line there. As for LGA, I don't know how feasible it is to extend a subway line out to the airport itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Staten Island
2,315 posts, read 1,151,643 times
Reputation: 3661
The LGA airtrain from Willets Point or extending the Astoria Line to LGA would be a waste of money. I doubt very many tourists, especially those traveling with families, are going to drag their luggage onto a NYC subway train/Airtain. Business travelers will continue to use Uber/Lyft and Taxis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top