Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is the problem. It shouldn't be one or the other. How about people only reproduce if you want and can afford the child. I know...shocking concept!
There is no price tag on children, it's not like buying a car. I can't tell you how much money I've spent on my kids or how much will I ever spend on them
__________________
"The man who sleeps on the floor, can never fall out of bed." -Martin Lawrence
More government dependence and seizure of agency from the population
We're all dependent on the government, like it or not. If you want to be truly independent, go off the grid. There's no one foot in one foot out, hokey pokey stuff.
__________________
"The man who sleeps on the floor, can never fall out of bed." -Martin Lawrence
The planet is overpopulated? Are you keeping track of the birthrate of the indigenous Amazon tribes? Lol.
Demographers are keeping track of birth rates everywhere. If there are redundant people at all, more people than resources, that equals overpopulation. At the onset of civilization about 5,000 years ago, the reconstructed estimate of human population of the entire planet was less than twice the current population of NYC. A more accurate estimate of the entire human population in the Middle Ages was about 2/3 of the current population of the US. The entire human population was less than 1.5 billion in 1900, about 3-3.5 billion when I was a kid in the 1960s, and is close to 8 billion now. That is extremely unnatural.
We're all dependent on the government, like it or not. If you want to be truly independent, go off the grid. There's no one foot in one foot out, hokey pokey stuff.
Hook me up with your gravy train because where I live I have to pay for my electricity and it's not cheap
Demographers are keeping track of birth rates everywhere. If there are redundant people at all, more people than resources, that equals overpopulation. At the onset of civilization about 5,000 years ago, the reconstructed estimate of human population of the entire planet was less than twice the current population of NYC. A more accurate estimate of the entire human population in the Middle Ages was about 2/3 of the current population of the US. The entire human population was less than 1.5 billion in 1900, about 3-3.5 billion when I was a kid in the 1960s, and is close to 8 billion now. That is extremely unnatural.
Human procreation is unnatural?
__________________
"The man who sleeps on the floor, can never fall out of bed." -Martin Lawrence
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
