Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-22-2009, 09:11 AM
 
1,669 posts, read 6,400,042 times
Reputation: 1194

Advertisements

I'm happy to see those who fought against the owners win. The owners took the city money for building and tax breaks, thus making it easy to rule with the renters that the owners violated law.
Tishman’s Stuyvesant Town Rent Rise Voided by Court (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2013, 11:02 AM
 
880 posts, read 2,025,295 times
Reputation: 637
bump
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 11:13 AM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,242,334 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevej64 View Post
bump
Bump? Have you seen this thread? //www.city-data.com/forum/new-y...-big-rent.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Denver, Colorado
1,976 posts, read 2,353,562 times
Reputation: 1769
That is good news. It's too bad some people want NYC to be strictly upper class. Same mentality as gated communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
1,871 posts, read 4,267,364 times
Reputation: 2937
Quote:
Originally Posted by artisan4 View Post
That is good news. It's too bad some people want NYC to be strictly upper class. Same mentality as gated communities.
The article is outdated since this thread started in 2009. The last I heard the owner was doing a mid-lease increase starting next month I believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2013, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,084,455 times
Reputation: 12769
^^^
Yeah,
There's a long thread on it a little ways down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,084,455 times
Reputation: 12769
From that original posted link:
Quote:

“The tenants argue the current and former owners of the properties,
respectively, were not entitled to take advantage of the luxury decontrol
provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law, while simultaneously receiving tax
incentive benefits under” New York City regulations, the court wrote. “We
agree.”


The ruling upheld a decision by a lower appeals court in Manhattan. That
court ruled in March that Tishman and the prior owner, MetLife Inc., wrongfully deregulated the apartments
by raising the rents because of a sale of the property in 2006.


Today’s decision means the companies might have to pay millions of dollars in
rent rebates to thousands of tenants. State law entitles tenants to triple
damages for illegal rent increases, lawyers in the case said.


‘Financial Consequences’


“Defendants predict dire financial consequences from our ruling, for
themselves and the New York City real estate industry generally,” the court
wrote today. “These predictions may not come true; they depend among other
things, on issues yet to be decided, including retroactively, class
certification, the statute of limitations, and other defenses that may be
applicable to particular tenants.”
I must wonder what the current court ruling ALLOWING huge increases uses as justification to countervene the ruling of these two presumably lower courts????

Did the company NOT take benefits and thus decontrol illegally? Has the stabilization law been changed to read that a company can take tax benefits geared towards maintaining affordability and still decontrol apartments? Were the first two judges declared mentally incompetent?
I know that the Supreme Court rules without rhyme or reason, makes laws and even selects presidents, but has that tendency extended downward to State courts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top