Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-10-2014, 09:59 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,405,433 times
Reputation: 4025

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
Don't change the subject -- you were talking how taxing the rich is closing the deficit and maybe upgrade the credit rating. I pointed out that CA's credit rating is the 2nd worst in the country.

Secondly, you need to look at deficits in terms of multiple years, or decades.

Thirdly, let's see how CA actually accomplishes it, rather than showing an "outlook" that some people say "it's fuzzy math."
Largest state in the country, largest economy. Of course it will have deficits. All large states have large deficits. Texas is #3 in budget deficits. It has very little to do with politics. California happens to be smart enough to raise taxes to close the gap, rather than eat up Federal money and drill through your own public school systems (Texas cough).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
I'll play this obsessive-compulsive game of rich vs the poor. Biggest disparity is in CA or even in our own state, NYS, where Govt is a lunatic.
Oh give me a break. Governor Cuomo has nothing to do with wealth inequality in New York. Wall Street and NYC housing costs are the cause of that (same for California with SoCal and SF Bay).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2014, 05:15 AM
 
Location: Ubique
4,318 posts, read 4,206,586 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
No buddy, the bigger the city, the higher the wealth inequality. Wealth inequality is highest in big cities. In rural areas, everyone is just poorer. Use some common sense.
You wanted numbers, I gave you numbers. Now you switch to "no, don't give me numbers: it's common sense."

Now, I am not sure what you're even saying anymore, other than generalities.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
Largest state in the country, largest economy. Of course it will have deficits. All large states have large deficits.
There is a time and place for deficits. The issue is that no one can run deficits in perpetuity. You have to deal with deficits structurally. Not reforming your liabilities, but simply padding taxes on a targeted group of people, especially when your competitors are lowering them -- that puts you at a serious economic disadvantage long-term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2014, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Palm Springs, CA
247 posts, read 525,885 times
Reputation: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
On the contrary...
Sorry for not being clear, I was addressing the others in the debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2014, 10:15 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,405,433 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
There is a time and place for deficits. The issue is that no one can run deficits in perpetuity. You have to deal with deficits structurally. Not reforming your liabilities, but simply padding taxes on a targeted group of people, especially when your competitors are lowering them -- that puts you at a serious economic disadvantage long-term.
No person can. No business can. However, governments are not people or businesses.

Governments run deficits indefinitely. They always have and always will. That is modern macroeconomics 101. A government deficit is a private sector suprlus. It's just basic double-entry bookkeeping.

You don't scratch your head as to why every state and Federal government runs deficits?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2014, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Ubique
4,318 posts, read 4,206,586 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
Governments run deficits indefinitely. They always have and always will.
Indefinite deficits? That an ideological position. Here are some numbers of our deficits since the Founding:



There have been plenty of times we have run surpluses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 06:57 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,405,433 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
Indefinite deficits? That an ideological position. Here are some numbers of our deficits since the Founding:



There have been plenty of times we have run surpluses.
Not since the Federal Reserve system of 1913. It is very rare. Surpluses are actually not good for the economy. I recommend you read up on modern economics. My statement is not an opinion nor an ideological position; modern governments can and do run deficits perpetually. The Federal government can do so infinitely. State governments like New York are currency users, but they receive Federal aide so it trickles down to them and essentially functions the same way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:45 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,091,524 times
Reputation: 15538
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
The list was for metro areas, not cities. Hence, why Buffalo and Rochester are #1 and #2 in snowiest large (>1 million) metros in the United States.
Again whatever two locations that never seem to make any list of places to live.



Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
You mean according to the Tax Foundation.

Numbers are numbers. Are you willing to donate $400 million to the Thruway Authority next year or would you like to raise the gas tax by the proper amount? The choice is yours. You are free to not use the Thruway if you don't want to pay, so I don't understand why you are complaining. The road is not free. I would take it up with New York State and the Federal Government. The only reason the Thruway was incorporated as part of the Interstate Highway System is so the Federal government does not have to fund it.
It really galls you that almost every other highway in this county is free and you continue to pay. We had toll roads also build by the state and not the federal government, but once they were paid off the tolls were removed. Virginia pays to maintain these state highways not the feds.

NY is one of only a handful that is still charging for a road build in the 50's, think it's paid for yet???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Ubique
4,318 posts, read 4,206,586 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
I recommend you read up on modern economics. My statement is not an opinion nor an ideological position; modern governments can and do run deficits perpetually. The Federal government can do so infinitely.
Your reading and understanding of economics seems very limited, and totally indoctrinated under an ideology. You can pick any ideology, and you will find thousands of economics books justifying it, often in fact driving this policy.

Same with the neo-marxist ideology you seem to be intoxicated by. Deficit spending is just another, albeit significant, means to pre-meditated ends.

I would also recommend you read up on history of economic systems, rises, falls, calamities, revolutions, wars, etc etc to start get a grasp on what you are advocating, explain to us why are we exempt from laws of economics, and mathematics at large.

These policies have always brought financial ruin to nations and states, never ever they have not brought financial and societal disasters. Enlighten us -- why are we exempt?

When you go to sleep today, know this -- We are one printing press from calamity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 12:29 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,405,433 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry10 View Post
Your reading and understanding of economics seems very limited, and totally indoctrinated under an ideology. You can pick any ideology, and you will find thousands of economics books justifying it, often in fact driving this policy.

Same with the neo-marxist ideology you seem to be intoxicated by. Deficit spending is just another, albeit significant, means to pre-meditated ends.

I would also recommend you read up on history of economic systems, rises, falls, calamities, revolutions, wars, etc etc to start get a grasp on what you are advocating, explain to us why are we exempt from laws of economics, and mathematics at large.

These policies have always brought financial ruin to nations and states, never ever they have not brought financial and societal disasters. Enlighten us -- why are we exempt?

When you go to sleep today, know this -- We are one printing press from calamity.
There is not a single shred of evidence to support that theory.

The biggest factors in economics have and always will be demographics. You can take your deficit scaremongering somewhere else because it has no factual basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Ubique
4,318 posts, read 4,206,586 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
There is not a single shred of evidence to support that theory.

The biggest factors in economics have and always will be demographics. You can take your deficit scaremongering somewhere else because it has no factual basis.
I already provided historical data that throw your "perpetual deficit" out of the window. The burden is on now you to prove your theory that a Govt can run deficits indefinitely. Keep in mind that our decade of deficits followed a decade of surpluses.

Go ahead, your turn..

Tell us about some facts --- how any Govt, now or in the past has run deficits indefinitely. Don't theoritize about a utopy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top