Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
While poring over a thread on the Ohio forum in which folks were arguing over whether Cincinatti or Cleveland was "better," I came across a reply with a helpful link that extrapolated upon U.S. Census Bureau patterns and projections to prognosticate what the population of all United States metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Here are the results for New York.
That seems too far ahead to make projections. The losses all seem too large as do the gains. I don't see Rochester or Buffalo losing that much population, and I don't see NYC and Poughkeepsie gaining that much.
I agree that it seems too far ahead. We don't know what will change in 20 years. Then again, in NYS government not much ever does. The new boss is always the same as the old boss.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
