Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2021, 07:34 AM
 
874 posts, read 728,539 times
Reputation: 977

Advertisements

according to Hochul "believing in strange things" offers no relief from her vaccine mandate. But now, she is getting in the way of millions of people from practicing their religion?



say I join a religion, which I have a right to do in america, any religion for that matter, and the pastor, priest or who ever tells us that the vaccine is the mark of the beast and we shouldn't take it because the bible says you will go to hell. Is someone not practicing their religion by not taking the vaccine? More over, if someone says, taking the vaccine is against my religion and puts it on record, and gets fired from their job, have just been fired for "practicing their religion?"


It would fall under religious discrimination according to OSHA







https://gothamist.com/news/after-rem...accine-mandate





New York has a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place for hospital and nursing home staff, and Governor Kathy Hochul wants to expand it to cover all state-regulated facilities and congregate settings.
Her announcement comes days after a state decision to further tighten the health care worker mandate, by eliminating religious exemptions against taking the shots.


“We’re going to be exploring all of our options to expand this, expanding mandates, not test-outs,” Hochul said Tuesday morning at a press conference in Buffalo.



https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/s...discrimination



SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION

OVERVIEW[1]

This Section of the Compliance Manual focuses on religious discrimination under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Title VII protects workers from employment discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and transgender status),[2] national origin, or protected activity. Under Title VII, an employer is prohibited from discriminating because of religion in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or other “terms, conditions or privileges” of employment, and also cannot “limit, segregate, or classify” applicants or employees based on religion “in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee.”[3] The statute defines “religion” as including “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that [it] is unable to reasonably accommodate . . . without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.”[4] “Undue hardship” under Title VII is not defined in the statute but has been defined by the Supreme Court as “more than a de minimis cost”[5] – a lower standard for employers to satisfy than the “undue hardship” defense under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is defined by statute as “significant difficulty or expense.”[6]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2021, 08:31 AM
 
93,292 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by broke&30 View Post
according to Hochul "believing in strange things" offers no relief from her vaccine mandate. But now, she is getting in the way of millions of people from practicing their religion?



say I join a religion, which I have a right to do in america, any religion for that matter, and the pastor, priest or who ever tells us that the vaccine is the mark of the beast and we shouldn't take it because the bible says you will go to hell. Is someone not practicing their religion by not taking the vaccine? More over, if someone says, taking the vaccine is against my religion and puts it on record, and gets fired from their job, have just been fired for "practicing their religion?"


It would fall under religious discrimination according to OSHA







https://gothamist.com/news/after-rem...accine-mandate





New York has a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place for hospital and nursing home staff, and Governor Kathy Hochul wants to expand it to cover all state-regulated facilities and congregate settings.
Her announcement comes days after a state decision to further tighten the health care worker mandate, by eliminating religious exemptions against taking the shots.


“We’re going to be exploring all of our options to expand this, expanding mandates, not test-outs,” Hochul said Tuesday morning at a press conference in Buffalo.



https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/s...discrimination



SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION

OVERVIEW[1]

This Section of the Compliance Manual focuses on religious discrimination under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Title VII protects workers from employment discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and transgender status),[2] national origin, or protected activity. Under Title VII, an employer is prohibited from discriminating because of religion in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or other “terms, conditions or privileges” of employment, and also cannot “limit, segregate, or classify” applicants or employees based on religion “in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee.”[3] The statute defines “religion” as including “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that [it] is unable to reasonably accommodate . . . without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.”[4] “Undue hardship” under Title VII is not defined in the statute but has been defined by the Supreme Court as “more than a de minimis cost”[5] – a lower standard for employers to satisfy than the “undue hardship” defense under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is defined by statute as “significant difficulty or expense.”[6]
If this is the case, might have to question the leadership. Especially when this isn’t done for other vaccines that we take for school or the military.

Also, do they have incite to when the new/third temple will be built in Jerusalem, as that will be a tip off to the end times according to many in the Jewish and Christian faiths.

Some the debate is among Christian/religious circles themselves. So, even taking the political aspect out of it, you still have different views within churches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 09:07 AM
Status: "UB Tubbie" (set 23 days ago)
 
20,046 posts, read 20,844,919 times
Reputation: 16728
Wow. Never thought 2 governors would be removed from office in such a short period of time.
Sharpen your pitchforks and fuel up your torches.
Good bye Kathy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 10:19 AM
 
Location: The Ozone Layer, apparently...
4,005 posts, read 2,081,502 times
Reputation: 7714
There are literally hundreds of holy people throughout history that belonged to no organized religion, and lived their lives as hermits.

Paul of Thebes, commonly known as Paul, the First Hermit or Paul the Anchorite (c. 227 – c. 341), is an Egyptian saint regarded as the first Christian hermit, who was claimed to have lived alone in the desert of Egypt from the age of sixteen to the age of one hundred and thirteen years old.

There are people faithfully practicing beliefs that do not fall within the confines of mainstream religion.

We live in a country that allows us to follow God (or whatever other method they use to reference such a deity) the Creator, and try to live pious lives. Its a Constitutional Right and nowhere in the Constitution is one system of belief held above another.

The point of that being, there is no deity that requires anyone to 'join a religion'. It is a heartfelt calling between you and your God.

Elijah was, according to the Books of Kings in the Hebrew Bible, a prophet and a miracle worker who lived in the northern kingdom of Israel during the reign of King Ahab (9th century BCE). He was born Hebrew, he didnt join a Hebrew group and then set about learning how to be a prophet and miracle worker.

Clearly civil rights, and the Patients Bill of Rights are being violated.

Last edited by ComeCloser; 09-11-2021 at 11:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 12:07 PM
 
15,842 posts, read 14,472,390 times
Reputation: 11916
The short and unsatisfying answer: The courts will have to decide. And it will get there. In the end, I think the rulings will come down on the side of the vaccine mandates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 01:27 PM
Status: "UB Tubbie" (set 23 days ago)
 
20,046 posts, read 20,844,919 times
Reputation: 16728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo Gibby View Post
So, if somebody's "religion" required him/her to make a human sacrifice every three months, the government shouldn't interfere because "it is a heartfelt calling between you and your God", right?
I’m Ok with that as long as it’s a willing sacrifice, like someone of their own congregation.
If they’re not abducting random people off the streets then what’s the harm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 02:38 PM
 
Location: The Ozone Layer, apparently...
4,005 posts, read 2,081,502 times
Reputation: 7714
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
The short and unsatisfying answer: The courts will have to decide. And it will get there. In the end, I think the rulings will come down on the side of the vaccine mandates.
You predict the courts will find a way around the law?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo Gibby View Post
So, if somebody's "religion" required him/her to make a human sacrifice every three months, the government shouldn't interfere because "it is a heartfelt calling between you and your God", right?
You know of religions that feel a human sacrifice to their God every 3 months will protect them from Covid? You hang out with some strange fruit indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 04:05 PM
 
15,842 posts, read 14,472,390 times
Reputation: 11916
Exactly what law and on what level? And do you know if such a law, if it actually exists, is applicable to this situation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComeCloser View Post
You predict the courts will find a way around the law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,077,378 times
Reputation: 9795
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComeCloser View Post
You predict the courts will find a way around the law?




You know of religions that feel a human sacrifice to their God every 3 months will protect them from Covid? You hang out with some strange fruit indeed.
Isn't forbidding masks and vaccine in the name of religion in a sense another form of human sacrifice? Sacrifice one's own body to the virus, and sacrifice other's health and potentially life by increasing the spread of the virus?

And as far as equal rights and responsibilities, wouldn't it be most non-discriminatory if there were NO religious exemptions allowed? Everyone would be equally responsible.

And how many of these are really religious exemptions, or just something that was made-up when COVID hit? There are few religions that historically have avoided medical interventions and vaccines, so unless a person or a sect has a history of it, prior to COVID, only those should even be considered in the first place. Not because their megachurch minister suddenly deemed it to be so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2021, 05:47 PM
 
Location: The Ozone Layer, apparently...
4,005 posts, read 2,081,502 times
Reputation: 7714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo Gibby View Post
Your attempt at deflection falls flat because you're the one who claimed that somebody wasn't required to be a member of any organized, recognized religion in order to hide behind the First Amendment. Logically, if someone doesn't have to be a member of a recognized religion in order to hide behind freedom of religion to thwart a vaccine mandate, then anybody who kills somebody can hide behind freedom of religion by claiming that his/her personal "religion" trumps any law against killing someone.
There is no logic in that. Its purely your opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top