Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Nissan and Infiniti
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2014, 10:03 PM
 
Location: NWA/SWMO
3,106 posts, read 3,991,373 times
Reputation: 3279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman66 View Post
I always loved Nissan growing up. The 300Z, the Pathfinder, the Maxima, the Xterra were some of my favorites. I have owned many Nissans and some that were close to the 200k mile range when I was younger and they both looked and drove brand new. I think Nissan really started the decline in the mid to late 2000's and then when they insulted the Pathfinder name with their newest "crossover" monstrosity I consider them to be dead.
Yeah, calling that a "Pathfinder" is like calling the fat waste of oxygen in the motorized scooter at the buffet "Hunter/Gatherer".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2014, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Henderson
1,110 posts, read 1,909,336 times
Reputation: 1039
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernnaturelover View Post
Because most people hate CVT transmissions.
I think it's the future of transmissions in the industry

To the main question- I think Nissan is the step child of the Japanese cars. They don't really have a "claim to fame". They are just ordinary like Kia and Hyunai used to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2014, 11:07 PM
 
Location: Henderson
1,110 posts, read 1,909,336 times
Reputation: 1039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlambert View Post
Quite frankly, while my Titan has an almost bulletproof engine and transmission it' pretty cheaply built. Panels are thin, paint oxidized within two years (despite being waxed twice a year), and the interior trim started cracking. Couple that with everything on it squeaking and rattling and it's enough to pretty much guarantee I'll never buy another. It's extremely reliable in getting from point A to B and can rival any full size truck in towing power, but is completely worthless in terms of fit and finish.
I have a 2006 Toyota Tundra. Good power train, very good ride quality but overall feel is not as solid as my 1995 Chevrolet truck. Almost everything seems light duty on the Tundra. The tailgate weighs almost nothing. Latches made of thin metal etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2014, 02:13 AM
 
Location: NWA/SWMO
3,106 posts, read 3,991,373 times
Reputation: 3279
Quote:
Originally Posted by skugelstadt View Post
I think it's the future of transmissions in the industry

To the main question- I think Nissan is the step child of the Japanese cars. They don't really have a "claim to fame". They are just ordinary like Kia and Hyunai used to be.
But Nissan's sucks. Subaru knows how to make a CVT. Nissan isn't getting it done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2014, 07:21 AM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,578,205 times
Reputation: 8284
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWG223 View Post
But Nissan's sucks. Subaru knows how to make a CVT. Nissan isn't getting it done.
This is true. The Jatco cvt's in the nissans due indeed suck compared to other manufactuers. I cant speak for Subarus but Honda's cvt is pleasant to drive unlike the cvt in my fiances Nissan Rogue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2014, 05:42 PM
 
3,046 posts, read 4,126,271 times
Reputation: 2131
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
This is true. The Jatco cvt's in the nissans due indeed suck compared to other manufactuers. I cant speak for Subarus but Honda's cvt is pleasant to drive unlike the cvt in my fiances Nissan Rogue.
Nissan is a company that has many troubles. They were called Datsun in the 70's,and rust buckets. Back in the middle 90's GM was on the verge of buying them. They were owned by Renault at that time. They almost went out of business. The cvt transmission IMO is very scary. It's a rubber belt, and is there a passing gear?. I had a friend work at the Nissan teck center in Plymouth Michigan. They were working on the Titan p/u truck design and he said the metal was so thin that you could dent it with just your thumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2014, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Huntsville
6,009 posts, read 6,667,017 times
Reputation: 7042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vannort54 View Post
They were working on the Titan p/u truck design and he said the metal was so thin that you could dent it with just your thumb.

Pretty true. I try not to sneeze near my bedsides so as not to wrinkle the metal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2014, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,771,707 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by skugelstadt View Post
I think Nissan is the step child of the Japanese cars. They don't really have a "claim to fame".
Sure they do. We just never got Skyline GT-Rs, until the current GTR now. Then there's the Z and, the Maxima and the Pathfinder which all have a great following.

Nissan/Datsun was actually one of the "chosen" manufacturers given the blessing and sent by the Japanese Imperial Palace to destroy (I mean conquer) America's car industry. The true misfit is Honda, who did not have the emperor's blessing - but invaded anyway.

Either way. They've had their troubles - and it took the French and the 2002 Altima to save them from extinction, but I like a lot of their products.

Still waiting for the Silvia to come back though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2014, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,295,255 times
Reputation: 5233
Nissan is the worst manufacturer for workers rights, and made Alabama a socialist state when it used tax payer dollars to give to Nissan. 1.3 billion to a private corporation. Whatever were they thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2014, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,771,707 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
Nissan is the worst manufacturer for workers rights, and made Alabama a socialist state when it used tax payer dollars to give to Nissan. 1.3 billion to a private corporation. Whatever were they thinking.
No. You must be thinking of Mississippi. We have Mercedes, Honda, Hyundai and Toyota plants here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Nissan and Infiniti
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top