Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Were platonic friendships more common in the 1970s or today?
More common in the 1970s 13 38.24%
More common today 9 26.47%
The same then as today 12 35.29%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2018, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
7,087 posts, read 8,651,647 times
Reputation: 9978

Advertisements

Are you kidding me?! In past decades, there is no way that a guy and a girl where both or one of them is in a serious relationship would EVER think of hanging out with each other, because it would be totally inappropriate, but in today's society you actually have to spell this out for people. There is no understanding of appropriate / inappropriate behavior whatsoever. My first girlfriend, I had to explain to her that it's not ok to show off her boobs at parties for "beads," Mardi Gras or not. Her response? "Well, it's my body, I just didn't think it was a big deal." Only a complete moron wouldn't realize that's inappropriate behavior. One thing she taught me and frankly so has every other girl is nothing is obvious anymore, it all has to be spelled out clearly like you're speaking to a 5-year-old about their chores.

It SHOULD be obvious not to text other guys / girls if you're in a relationship, but since it isn't, you have to explain it. It SHOULD be obvious you don't go drink with members of the opposite gender in party settings without your SO there, but it isn't. I feel sorry for people dating in today's society. I would never go back. If my GF and I weren't getting married, or I somehow ended up divorced down the road, I'd just opt for a life of being a player, that way I don't have to worry about what she's doing. "When it Rome," basically. The way girls behave today, I'm not sure why any guy would want to commit to them. There are still some good ones out there, but boy, it's rare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2018, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Dessert
10,918 posts, read 7,443,183 times
Reputation: 28131
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanLB View Post
Are you kidding me?! In past decades, there is no way that a guy and a girl where both or one of them is in a serious relationship would EVER think of hanging out with each other, because it would be totally inappropriate, but in today's society you actually have to spell this out for people. There is no understanding of appropriate / inappropriate behavior whatsoever. My first girlfriend, I had to explain to her that it's not ok to show off her boobs at parties for "beads," Mardi Gras or not. Her response? "Well, it's my body, I just didn't think it was a big deal." Only a complete moron wouldn't realize that's inappropriate behavior. One thing she taught me and frankly so has every other girl is nothing is obvious anymore, it all has to be spelled out clearly like you're speaking to a 5-year-old about their chores.

It SHOULD be obvious not to text other guys / girls if you're in a relationship, but since it isn't, you have to explain it. It SHOULD be obvious you don't go drink with members of the opposite gender in party settings without your SO there, but it isn't. I feel sorry for people dating in today's society. I would never go back. If my GF and I weren't getting married, or I somehow ended up divorced down the road, I'd just opt for a life of being a player, that way I don't have to worry about what she's doing. "When it Rome," basically. The way girls behave today, I'm not sure why any guy would want to commit to them. There are still some good ones out there, but boy, it's rare.
Different times have different morals. Yours seem to be a little old fashioned (and I'm in my sixties). It IS her body, and if it's no big deal to her, then it's no big deal. If it's a big deal to you, you should find someone else instead of calling her a moron.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 09:31 PM
 
779 posts, read 473,782 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanLB View Post
Are you kidding me?! In past decades, there is no way that a guy and a girl where both or one of them is in a serious relationship would EVER think of hanging out with each other, because it would be totally inappropriate, but in today's society you actually have to spell this out for people. There is no understanding of appropriate / inappropriate behavior whatsoever. My first girlfriend, I had to explain to her that it's not ok to show off her boobs at parties for "beads," Mardi Gras or not. Her response? "Well, it's my body, I just didn't think it was a big deal." Only a complete moron wouldn't realize that's inappropriate behavior. One thing she taught me and frankly so has every other girl is nothing is obvious anymore, it all has to be spelled out clearly like you're speaking to a 5-year-old about their chores.

It SHOULD be obvious not to text other guys / girls if you're in a relationship, but since it isn't, you have to explain it. It SHOULD be obvious you don't go drink with members of the opposite gender in party settings without your SO there, but it isn't. I feel sorry for people dating in today's society. I would never go back. If my GF and I weren't getting married, or I somehow ended up divorced down the road, I'd just opt for a life of being a player, that way I don't have to worry about what she's doing. "When it Rome," basically. The way girls behave today, I'm not sure why any guy would want to commit to them. There are still some good ones out there, but boy, it's rare.
As a man, I can show my chest whenever I want. Why should it be any different for a woman? While I may or may not think it's appropriate or not, it surely isn't YOUR body. Mindyaownbizness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 10:31 PM
 
776 posts, read 396,124 times
Reputation: 672
This thread is about platonic friendships, not about toplessness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 11:07 PM
 
5,455 posts, read 3,403,130 times
Reputation: 12177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyewackette View Post
You "know" that, do you? Do you also "know" that brownies clean your house for you if you leave a bowl of cream out for them?


The opinions of people you know don't make it fact. LOL!

I've had tons of platonic friendships. Only one or two advanced to a dating stage. I can't recall anyone ever making an unwanted advance. Not among my friends, those only came from people I didn't like for other reasons, LOL!
Do we all have to back up our thoughts and opinions with facts? Nope. Not at all.
But if you want clarification, you can google it and check it out.

It's not necessary to be mean. Take a pill. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 12:57 AM
 
Location: Salinas, CA
15,408 posts, read 6,213,037 times
Reputation: 8435
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguitar77111 View Post
Yes



National drinking age, Parents Music Resource Center, zero tolerance schools, sex offender registry, bike helmet laws, bigger homework loads
That is all true. Plus the AIDS crisis started in the mid 1980's. While not everyone changed their behavior, a significant number of people were more cautious. So it is safe to say that platonic relations were a little more common after the 1970's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Kalamalka Lake, B.C.
3,563 posts, read 5,386,504 times
Reputation: 4975
Default the aftermath of the sixties

I found/find that in the aftermath of the sixties there was a spillover of social connection. But today, no. And today there's no "aftermath" socially to build upon.

I had lots of female pals in the seventies, including hanging around with friends' wives. Not today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2018, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,887 posts, read 9,442,687 times
Reputation: 38512
I was born in 1953, and I truly have no idea if platonic friendships have become more or less common than they were in the past, but I suspect that they have been because it seems that there is MUCH less of an emphasis on the idea that people should bet married, and back when I was a young woman in the 70's and 80's, most women that I knew evaluated every single man they met as to whether he would be a candidate as a future husband for her or not -- and if not, they moved on. Back then, although women did have friends, it was usually friends of their boyfriends or husbands or brothers -- and maybe work or school friends on a very limited basis if they had been eliminated as "marriage prospects".

I think it is much better these days for women and men to look at each other as people and not just as potential spouses, but judging from what I have heard and read, I think that young people are much more promiscuous now than they have ever been before, and although I am no prude, I don't think that is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2018, 12:30 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,045,818 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdieBelle View Post

You're suggesting that Americans became more Puritanical in the 80s and 90s? That's not really true.


I don't agree. From the people a bit older than me (around 50 ish) they saw a decidedly more sexual conservative slant being taken when the AIDS scare arose. People didn't know how it was spread, and there was by most accounts I have heard (including from older family members and friends) and distinct change in sexual habits toward being more puritanical in the early to mid 80s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2018, 01:09 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,252 posts, read 108,199,089 times
Reputation: 116244
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguitar77111 View Post
Yes



National drinking age, Parents Music Resource Center, zero tolerance schools, sex offender registry, bike helmet laws, bigger homework loads
How are these examples of society becoming more Puritanical? What do bike helmets have to do with it? And sex offender registries? What's a "zero tolerance school"? Zero tolerance of what? OP, please explain your OP, so we can understand and participate. Right now, it's one big mystery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top