Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-03-2012, 12:58 PM
 
3,375 posts, read 6,260,799 times
Reputation: 2453

Advertisements

The Census came out with new numbers for Occupied housing units, Occupied by owners, Occupied by renters.

National homeownership rate is pegged at 65 percent - The Business Journals


Interesting to see. The highest percentage of renters come in counties with universities and/or military bases.

Article about North Carolina:
Durham County has state?s lowest homeownership rate - Triangle Business Journal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2012, 05:11 PM
 
3,065 posts, read 8,899,273 times
Reputation: 2092
The rest of the bottom five are Pitt, Watauga, Cumberland and Onslow. Two counties anchored by colleges, and to counties anchored by military bases. Both leading to understandably high rental rates and conversely low homeownership. What's Durham's excuse? I know it has colleges as well, but not exclusively so. If you remove App State, ECU, Fort Bragg, and Camp Lejeune those other counties are empty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 05:50 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,975,811 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBojangles View Post
The highest percentage of renters come in counties with universities and/or military bases.
That's the distinction between incidental and causal.

Universities and military bases are examples of communities with large numbers of intentionally transient
people (both singles and families). Whether they have the financial ability to buy or not few will want to make the purchase commitment when they expect to be moving on within a few years.

Beyond the transient we have a rather large number of people today with less than ideal job security.
Whether they have the financial ability to buy or not few will choose to make the purchase commitment when they are concerned they'll be forced to move on within a few years.

That leaves the poor and the stuck. No real options to have it better if they did move on, don't really want to move on but still no real ability to buy no matter how long they stay.

Nationally home ownership has never been above the middle 60's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top