Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-12-2013, 06:27 AM
 
Location: The 12th State
22,974 posts, read 65,493,145 times
Reputation: 15081

Advertisements

A bill http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/Bi...um=0introduced Republican Avila (Wake); Collins (Franklin, Nash); Burr (Montgomery, Stanley) ; in the state House is being touted as a way to save patients hundreds of millions by making it easier for physicians to open same-day surgery centers that usually charge less than hospitals. The state's hospital association is lobbying against the bill.

North Carolina has one of the nation’s most restrictive certificate of need (CON) programs.
The CON laws were designed to prevent excessive facilities and equipment.
Instead of reducing costs as intended, the bill’s proponents say the program squelches competition and makes routine surgeries more expensive.

Provision in the bill is in most counties, the state medical facilities plan would no longer limit the number of single-specialty operating rooms for ambulatory surgery centers, offices focused on providing same-day surgical care.
An exception: The bill would not allow new ambulatory surgery rooms in 23 counties with small, financially vulnerable hospitals known as “critical access hospitals.”

One of sponsor Avila says getting bill to pass is a long shot due to the hospital lobbyist they contribute over a million dollars to PAC's in 2011
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2014, 06:30 PM
 
725 posts, read 1,499,926 times
Reputation: 866
I saw a commercial today asking viewers to support the bill. It seems silly to me to limit the number of hospitals and medical centers being built "to better manage cost". Holly Springs has been trying for years to build a hospital and the certificate of need has blocked multiple hospital groups from building - recently Rex finally has been given the okay.

What kind of arguments do the people on the certificate of need side (in favor of maintaining the status quo) have for saying it helps keep costs lower? Or is there something else I am missing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top