Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"measure that would allow some public officials in North Carolina to opt out of performing gay marriages moved closer to becoming law on Monday, when lawmakers voted to override Republican Governor Pat McCrory’s veto of the bill."
Backwards March!
I'd like to see their "flawed reasoning" come back to bite them in the rear. Imagine, the first gay magistrate who will only sanction gay marriage and will not marry a straight couple because of his or her "so-called" religious beliefs. The state assembly would be saying "Ah,ah ...no we didn't mean it to do this!" Well, too bad - so sad, it can apply to the reverse situation!
Religious beliefs are a civil right. Also your comparison doesn't work, there is a difference between a private business and the government. The government is not allowed to decide which religious beliefs are valid and which ones aren't.
No, freedom to practice the religion of your choosing is a civil right. And there's nothing about this situation that constitutes the "government" deciding anything about the validity of anyone's religious beliefs.
No, freedom to practice the religion of your choosing is a civil right. And there's nothing about this situation that constitutes the "government" deciding anything about the validity of anyone's religious beliefs.
The very act of having religious beliefs is "practicing the religion of your choosing". The government is telling the magistrate "your beliefs are invalid, you must perform this ceremony" so yes, it is making a decision about the validity of someone's belief.
The very act of having religious beliefs is "practicing the religion of your choosing". The government is telling the magistrate "your beliefs are invalid, you must perform this ceremony" so yes, it is making a decision about the validity of someone's belief.
"measure that would allow some public officials in North Carolina to opt out of performing gay marriages moved closer to becoming law on Monday, when lawmakers voted to override Republican Governor Pat McCrory’s veto of the bill."
I say congratulations to the legislature -- well done!
If your party's policies are so popular, why did you lose big in the last two state elections, even as our state's urban areas have supposedly grown more blue? Judging by your frequent political posts, you must be one of those goons who attends the Moral Monday protests.
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,814 posts, read 34,688,469 times
Reputation: 10256
Quote:
Originally Posted by netbrad
The very act of having religious beliefs is "practicing the religion of your choosing". The government is telling the magistrate "your beliefs are invalid, you must perform this ceremony" so yes, it is making a decision about the validity of someone's belief.
Brad, you're at it again.
Under British rule. people who were not Anglicans were called Dissenters. Dissenters did not qualify for the same rights as Anglicans. The freedom to practice religion means that you can not be classified as a citizen with lesser rights because of your religion. That does not give you the right to push your religion down the throats of others as they do in Rowan County & it doesn't give you the right to deny someone a service that your job requires you to provide just because. . .
If the magistrates don't want to perform their duties for everyone, let them find another job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.