Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-08-2020, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
3,604 posts, read 4,447,100 times
Reputation: 5806

Advertisements

Someone on another forum posted this rendering of Fayetteville St. HQ/hotel combo. I think the scale looks way off, the HQ building is twice as tall as BB&T. Yes it will be a block closer and 10 stories higher, but that looks way exaggerated. I'm no pro, though. Opinions?


 
Old 03-08-2020, 01:00 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
797 posts, read 671,469 times
Reputation: 1202
It's about a block and a half closer than BB&T from that angle, so even at the same height it would look taller (sort of like how BB&T looks taller than PNC).
 
Old 03-08-2020, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
3,604 posts, read 4,447,100 times
Reputation: 5806
BB&T is 2 blocks closer than PNC Plaza and it doesn't seem to rise on the same scale as RCC. I just didn't think a block and a half would make it seem so large. I'm still not convinced haha
 
Old 03-08-2020, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,141 posts, read 1,022,591 times
Reputation: 530
That rendering is way off. Those two lots are simply concepts anyways so meh.
 
Old 03-08-2020, 06:09 PM
 
569 posts, read 337,573 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trent Y View Post
That rendering is way off. Those two lots are simply concepts anyways so meh.
Whatever is eventually built at this location will look different than what's shown in the renderings. No need to be worried about this picture. However, I will let the city know that their architect goofed up on the "pictures".
 
Old 03-08-2020, 06:17 PM
 
569 posts, read 337,573 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Well it's certainly not the worst problem to have.
Yup. These buildings will look very nice. In Raleigh or anywhere else. No complaints from me.
 
Old 03-08-2020, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
3,604 posts, read 4,447,100 times
Reputation: 5806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Raleigh View Post
Whatever is eventually built at this location will look different than what's shown in the renderings. No need to be worried about this picture. However, I will let the city know that their architect goofed up on the "pictures".
Yeah I know it's just a render and these buildings were just concepts, but folks are arguing that that is definitely an accurate portrayal of the size. "professional architects" supposedly. I'm not sold lol
 
Old 03-09-2020, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
3,655 posts, read 3,899,994 times
Reputation: 4314
Downtown Greensboro seems to not have any trees integrated in with the street scape.

Trees are NC's greatest asset and define its image and identity.

The Tanger Center looks like it'll be a very hot place to stand in the summer.
 
Old 03-09-2020, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
3,655 posts, read 3,899,994 times
Reputation: 4314
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordHelmit View Post
Someone on another forum posted this rendering of Fayetteville St. HQ/hotel combo. I think the scale looks way off, the HQ building is twice as tall as BB&T. Yes it will be a block closer and 10 stories higher, but that looks way exaggerated. I'm no pro, though. Opinions?
The BB&T building and the Wells Fargo tower were built while I was at NC State, (1987-1991).

BB&T (Truist) was designed by Gruzen Samton in NY, and I used to work with the lady who heads their interiors dept.

Those of you outside of Raleigh may only see this tower from its broad side elevation, which is ho hum, just ok.

But looking from the West or East, it's an elegant, thin, almost art-deco design.

That thinner elevation was the first to puncture the tree line and be visible briefly in certain spots of West Raleigh, (Avent Ferry, NC State off-campus neighborhoods).

It was a delight, albeit a very small one. I remember a professor from Germany being shocked after seeing a building poke through the trees as he drove down Western Blvd., lol.


Both are 29 floors i believe, and we (friends) snuck in both near the end of construction, even going to the top floor of both buildings one day.

Both towers cost around $30 million each to build around 1990.

The PNC arena was built at a cost of arounc $120 million around the year 2000.

For perspective, the new Port Authority Bus Terminal in NYC is expected to cost around $10 billion, which in theory could have built about 80 PNC arenas, lol.
 
Old 03-09-2020, 06:21 PM
 
1,545 posts, read 1,860,265 times
Reputation: 1849
Quote:
Originally Posted by architect77 View Post
Downtown Greensboro seems to not have any trees integrated in with the street scape.

Trees are NC's greatest asset and define its image and identity.

The Tanger Center looks like it'll be a very hot place to stand in the summer.
.
This isn't true
.

.

.

.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfX1PD2rqUk

you don't really have to watch the video, but the clips of downtown, show that DT Gboro is tree lined
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top