Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-14-2020, 06:49 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pfalz View Post
I find it interesting that the census estimates show rapid declaration of growth for Wake and Mecklenburg in the 2010's. I've lived in Charlotte all my life and I feel like the growth has accelerated this decade.
Despite the obsession to focus on the urban development in our cities, the reality is that the majority of development in our metros remains suburban. This means that the boundaries of development continue to push out into the woods and fields, and that means into border counties.
While this occurs around both Charlotte and Raleigh, both Mecklenburg and Wake County are seeing a larger share of their development happening in their cores and first ring suburban areas as re-development in a much denser mode, and that development is very visible in the public realm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2020, 09:14 AM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,858,470 times
Reputation: 1954
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Despite the obsession to focus on the urban development in our cities, the reality is that the majority of development in our metros remains suburban. This means that the boundaries of development continue to push out into the woods and fields, and that means into border counties.
While this occurs around both Charlotte and Raleigh, both Mecklenburg and Wake County are seeing a larger share of their development happening in their cores and first ring suburban areas as re-development in a much denser mode, and that development is very visible in the public realm.
Very true...the amount of houses being built in many of the largest metros have slowed. Apartment construction has gone from suburban to urban so they are much more visible. Location has become the most important factor in apartment construction since the whole non steel framing was introduced...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...-look-the-same

Plus you cant just add people by annexing anymore, which was part of the percentage growth in the decades before this last decade. In many cases the cities were already built, but they just werent part of the city. Now the boundaries dont move as easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2020, 12:17 PM
 
1,826 posts, read 2,495,900 times
Reputation: 1811
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Despite the obsession to focus on the urban development in our cities, the reality is that the majority of development in our metros remains suburban. This means that the boundaries of development continue to push out into the woods and fields, and that means into border counties.
While this occurs around both Charlotte and Raleigh, both Mecklenburg and Wake County are seeing a larger share of their development happening in their cores and first ring suburban areas as re-development in a much denser mode, and that development is very visible in the public realm.
Indeed. I pointed this out in another thread. On these forums many seem to be obsessed with which place is the densest, the most urban, most walkable, etc. but the fact of the matter is that the majority of people moving to these cities prefer suburban style development and that's what the vast majority of the development occurring is. I work in Land Development and despite all the large apartment complexes being built around Charlotte, they are dwarfed by the singe-family residential developments being built in the suburbs surrounding the city. So much that there are engineering firms who only design single-family residential developments and making great money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2020, 02:21 PM
 
4,596 posts, read 6,427,227 times
Reputation: 4193
And that is not sustainable. A lot of what are called “preferences” is simply people resigning themselves to the fact that what is best is sadly unaffordable or unattainable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top