Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma > Oklahoma City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2009, 08:27 AM
 
Location: TULSA
18 posts, read 41,700 times
Reputation: 44

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by okcpulse View Post
That is actually VERY incorrect and VERY inaccurate. This is where I stress a need for an urban geography course in college or high school.

Oklahoma City's urbanized area is 243 contiguous square miles, to be exact. If Oklahoma City were to shed the rest, its population would drop from 547,000 to 510,000. not a big difference at all. That would place our population density at nearly 2100 per square mile. A simple glance at a wall map would quickly prove my point. Much of OKC's area will never be developed. Some of it will go underwater when the proposed Elm Creek Reservior is built.

So, Oklahoma City does not have over 500,000 BECAUSE we have 608 square miles of land area. Our land area is of no consequence, and to assume that only 800 people live in the square mile area of, say, Hefner/N.W. 122nd/MacArthur/Rockwell is a bad assumption.

Now, you accuse OKC of not being able to stand the fact that Tulsa has taller buildings. That is also very inaccurate. OKC doesn't care that Tulsa has taller buildings. Tulsa cares that Tulsa has taller buildings, and they love to rub it in OKC's face every chance they get.

The fact that Devon Tower will be the tallest in the state is not to satisfy any competition with Tulsa. Larry Nichols just wanted an icon for OKC, and he got one. No need to read deep into it.

And the Ford Center isn't being remodeled to "look better" that Tulsa's roll of duct tape. We are remodeling because we knew we had a bare-bones arena and needed a better facility for ourselves to enjoy, and to accomodate the NBA.

Please don't put words into OKC's mouth, especially when you are no Rembrandt of urban analysis.
Bare bones arena, as you quote. Why not do it right the first time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:44 AM
 
498 posts, read 1,606,394 times
Reputation: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by fciman View Post
Bare bones arena, as you quote. Why not do it right the first time?
The first time, construction costs went through the roof because of rising steel prices and other building materials, so the designs had to be revised and scaled back to meet the $89 million budgeted for the arena. Because of lesser-than-expected sales tax collections that occured in the 1997-98 fiscal year, coupled with higher-than-expected construction costs of several other MAPS projects under construction at the time, the problem was compounded.

There was discussion of scrapping the arena altogether, but ultimately, the sales tax was extended an extra six months to meet the construction costs in a campaign called "Finish MAPS Right".

Keep in mind, fciman, 8 other major projects from the same package were under construction as well, and the program was design to be a "Pay-As-You-Go" program, meaning the city didn't finance any of the projects. The projects were paid for strictly from the coffers, so all projects are debt-free.

Thus, the city simply didn't anticipate that by the time construction began in 1999, $89 million would not be enough for a state-of-the-art arena, and to keep cost overruns under control, a bare-bones arena was built and left for a future upgrade. We all knew that when the facility opened. Bringing events to the city with a facility in place was the number one priority, and not necessarily building an icon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 08:40 PM
 
498 posts, read 1,606,394 times
Reputation: 516
Let's please get back on topic regarding the Devon Tower.

Last edited by LadyRobyn; 03-19-2009 at 09:31 PM.. Reason: Removed orphaned quote...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 09:33 PM
 
Location: Duncan, OK
2,919 posts, read 6,829,346 times
Reputation: 3140
Quote:
Originally Posted by okcpulse View Post
Let's please get back on topic regarding the Devon Tower.
Excellent idea. Thank-you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2009, 03:44 PM
 
1 posts, read 4,362 times
Reputation: 10
Hi, Ive read that the building has been changed, of design? and time when its going to be built.

Is there a specific date that its going to be built?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 07:53 AM
 
20 posts, read 382,256 times
Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt6195 View Post
Hi, Ive read that the building has been changed, of design? and time when its going to be built.

Is there a specific date that its going to be built?
Hi. The building is still on track and actually progressing a little ahead of schedule. I attempted to post an article that contained the update, but it was deleted in light of the TOS. You can go to the journalrecord.com and search "devon" to find the article. You have to subscribe to read it though. Regards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2009, 06:53 PM
 
498 posts, read 1,606,394 times
Reputation: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt6195 View Post
Hi, Ive read that the building has been changed, of design? and time when its going to be built.

Is there a specific date that its going to be built?
The design of the building has not changed. However, they are considering adding an auditorium next to the podium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831
Construction starts soon!!











http://www.okc.biz/Libraries/June_2009_issue/devontower.sflb.ashx (broken link)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831
New rendering...God this tower is so pretty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:12 PM
 
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY
559 posts, read 1,757,676 times
Reputation: 554
its height also got cut by 17 ft.
http://www.newsok.com/devon-official..._lead_business
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma > Oklahoma City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top