Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Regardless of my personal views on the measure, Measure 91 on the Fall 2014 Oregon ballot will:
Pass 67 84.81%
Fail 12 15.19%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2014, 01:58 AM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,721,391 times
Reputation: 1378

Advertisements

Many youths know it isn't fatal regardless of amount used. They know it helps many medical conditions, & they know it is fun & relaxing. They also know that alcohol and tobacco kill many. As for use before brains are fully formed, what medical researchers are finding is that it helps promote the growth of healthy new brain cells. So far, I haven't seen anyone prove extra (non-cancerous) brain cells are harmful.

Dr. Gabriel Nahaus of Columbia University put a face mask on a monkey & forced it to breathe in smoke from 63 joints for 5 minutes (brain damage by no oxygen). This is why they say it causes brain damage.

The government fairly recently announced it had money to give to researchers to discover ways that cannabis could harm the young that didn't apply to adult use. The 1st I heard of those was they claimed they found 3 teens who had strokes from using cannabis. How could that happen when cannabis widens blood vessels? Do you believe some people lie to make or protect a fortune? Thanks & best wishes.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Nell Plotts View Post
What concerns me is that our youth will be further encouraged to use it before their brains are fully formed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2014, 12:08 PM
 
2,542 posts, read 4,002,944 times
Reputation: 3615
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articl...lly-That-Bad-/

Quote:
Rogeberg’s conclusion counters a sizeable literature, however, which supports a link between pot use and neurophysiological decline. Studies in both humans and animals suggest that people who acquiring a marijuana habit in adolescence face long-term negative impacts on brain function, with some users finding it difficult to concentrate and learn new tasks.

Notably, most studies on the subject suggest that while there may be negative consequences of smoking as a teen, users who begin in adulthood are generally unaffected. This may be due to endocannabinoid-directed reorganization of the brain during puberty, Hermann explained. The intake of cannabinoids that comes with pot use may cause irreversible “misleading of the neural growth,” he said.
Cannabis Use is Quantitatively Associated with Nucleus Accumbens and Amygdala Abnormalities in Young Adult Recreational Users

Quote:
The results of this study indicate that in young, recreational
marijuana users, structural abnormalities in gray matter density,
volume, and shape of the nucleus accumbens and amygdala can
be observed.

Last edited by BendLocal; 08-31-2014 at 12:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 01:20 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,502,664 times
Reputation: 1873
Nobody is talking about legalizing it for adolescents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 09:17 PM
 
2,542 posts, read 4,002,944 times
Reputation: 3615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander_Crews View Post
Nobody is talking about legalizing it for adolescents.
One argument is that it becomes more socially acceptable if it's legal and therefore leads to higher use among adolescents.

Not sure if the data backs up the argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 10:30 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,502,664 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by BendLocal View Post
One argument is that it becomes more socially acceptable if it's legal and therefore leads to higher use among adolescents.

Not sure if the data backs up the argument.
It doesn't. Reality proves that argument to be fallacious and incorrect.

Despite Legalization, Colorado Teenagers Stubbornly Refuse to Smoke More Pot
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 10:47 PM
 
26,639 posts, read 36,722,762 times
Reputation: 29911
It could also go the other way. Some adolescents may be attracted to weed because of the romance of it being illegal. If Grandma and her mates are legally lighting up, some of that appeal may dissipate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 12:50 PM
 
2,542 posts, read 4,002,944 times
Reputation: 3615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metlakatla View Post
It could also go the other way. Some adolescents may be attracted to weed because of the romance of it being illegal. If Grandma and her mates are legally lighting up, some of that appeal may dissipate.
Could be but it doesn't appear to stop underage drinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 12:54 PM
 
2,542 posts, read 4,002,944 times
Reputation: 3615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander_Crews View Post
It doesn't. Reality proves that argument to be fallacious and incorrect.

Despite Legalization, Colorado Teenagers Stubbornly Refuse to Smoke More Pot
That time period is far too short to draw a conclusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 01:03 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,502,664 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by BendLocal View Post
That time period is far too short to draw a conclusion.
Doesn't change the fact that there is no data to support the claim that legalization increases teen use, and evidence to the contrary DOES exist.

It really doesn't matter if you deem the time period too short, the data still does not support the claim you are presenting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 01:42 PM
 
1,027 posts, read 2,049,329 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Rogeberg’s conclusion counters a sizeable literature, however, which supports a link between pot use and neurophysiological decline. Studies in both humans and animals suggest that people who acquiring a marijuana habit in adolescence face long-term negative impacts on brain function, with some users finding it difficult to concentrate and learn new tasks.

Does the study say if it is smoking pot one or two times a week or smoking pot every day cause long-term brain damage ?

I know drinking alcohol kills brain cells but that is people who drink alcohol like water and very alcoholic person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top