Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2014, 05:16 PM
zdg
 
Location: Sonoma County
845 posts, read 1,972,765 times
Reputation: 1144

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Vega View Post
I'm a Republican partisan and hate taxes with a passion buy I do think you should have a sales tax so all the deadbeats pay something. But only if that would reduce property and income tax and that will never happen!
What an amazing and very telling post.

"I hate paying for things and think other people should pay for them."

You're the taker you complain so bitterly about. You realize this, yes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2014, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidlo View Post
ha ha ha ho ho ho.... Ok, so I spent hundreds of dollars this season on the internet.... We spent 90 on the prime rib roast. I'm feeding 9 people this year. If we were vegan I would have saved a ton on meat!


There are deadbeats at all levels people don't kid yourselves. I grew up in a neighborhood that specialized in breeding government dependent people. You have not really lived until your neighbor asks why I go to work for just a tiny bit more money than he gets for doing zilch.

Political perspective. Yes, Oregon needs an income tax. Leave the rest of the taxes in place. It might shake a few people up enough to finally say WTH?!?!?!!? If you don't like it, vote for change or move. I voted with my feet. My retirement acct is thanking me already.
Texas floats on their oil taxes, so the whole country pays tax to Texas. Oregon's income tax has some benefits. I finally talked my wife into retiring after she saw our income tax bill from last year. It's going to take a bite out of my tax sheltered accounts starting when I turn 70.5 though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2014, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Houston
1,257 posts, read 2,653,547 times
Reputation: 1236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
Texas floats on their oil taxes, so the whole country pays tax to Texas. Oregon's income tax has some benefits. I finally talked my wife into retiring after she saw our income tax bill from last year. It's going to take a bite out of my tax sheltered accounts starting when I turn 70.5 though.
While oil is one aspect of the Texas economy. It isn't the only thing going on. What I find refreshing is the way taxes are collected. Sales tax is a straight up consumptive tax. Everyone pays it. Buy less stuff pay less tax. Property taxes are high but our schools (here in the burbs) are better than what I was paying for in Portland. Taxes paid per square foot are 1/2 of what I paid in Portland (apples to apples). If Texas is all oil we are about to be in trouble. I think it will just slow the economy down some in the state.

I don't hear anyone complaining about cheap fuel.

Use fees are the most honest ways to collect tax in general. I hear people howling about sales taxes affecting the "poor". Even Texas has tax free holidays for energy efficient appliances, and back to school stuff (very wide category)

Whole unprepared foods are un-taxed.

A sales tax collects money from everyone fairly. Don't wanna pay tax? There is always craigslist. The guy you buy from will pay tax when he spends your money.

A progressive (remember that word) income tax looks like it punishes achievement. If you went to college and worked hard to get ready for the world you get to pay more tax. You get less of what you worked hard to get. Your family gets less.

No system is perfect, Fair means across the board, not only for some. Can we meet somewhere between Ayn Rand and Karl Marx?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2014, 10:00 AM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,826,232 times
Reputation: 10783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidlo View Post
While oil is one aspect of the Texas economy. It isn't the only thing going on. What I find refreshing is the way taxes are collected. Sales tax is a straight up consumptive tax. Everyone pays it. Buy less stuff pay less tax. Property taxes are high but our schools (here in the burbs) are better than what I was paying for in Portland. Taxes paid per square foot are 1/2 of what I paid in Portland (apples to apples). If Texas is all oil we are about to be in trouble. I think it will just slow the economy down some in the state.

I don't hear anyone complaining about cheap fuel.

Use fees are the most honest ways to collect tax in general. I hear people howling about sales taxes affecting the "poor". Even Texas has tax free holidays for energy efficient appliances, and back to school stuff (very wide category)

Whole unprepared foods are un-taxed.

A sales tax collects money from everyone fairly. Don't wanna pay tax? There is always craigslist. The guy you buy from will pay tax when he spends your money.

A progressive (remember that word) income tax looks like it punishes achievement. If you went to college and worked hard to get ready for the world you get to pay more tax. You get less of what you worked hard to get. Your family gets less.

No system is perfect, Fair means across the board, not only for some. Can we meet somewhere between Ayn Rand and Karl Marx?
Given how narrow the income tax bands are, we don't actually have a progressive income tax. There is no significant difference on % tax on incomes for a couple earning $15,900 as $55,000 as $550,000 as $5,500,000.

There is also the argument that because of the federal tax deduction, taxes are actually regressive: higher on lower incomes:
Quote:
The results are surprising. In Oregon, income between $8,150 and $125,000 has a stated tax rate of 9 percent. But because of the federal subtraction, Listokin and Stegemiller found that income between $7,945 and $15,025 is taxed at effective rates between 7.65 and 8.1 percent, while income between $42,350 and $46,785 is taxed an effective rate of 6.75 percent.
Study: Oregon's income tax is regressive thanks to an obscure tax break | OregonLive.com

On a purely theoretical level, a split between income taxes and sales taxes makes more sense - as you say, when times are tight you can cut some consumption (and usually things like groceries and medicines are not taxed). On a practical level, I am positive that no one trusts the legislature enough not to ratchet the rates up immediately.

Tourism is a big factor in Oregon's economy, and other than some pretty stiff hotel taxes, that is a sector that we don't tax. A 3-5% sales tax would be viewed as amusingly low by tourist and likely outrageous by residents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2014, 01:33 PM
 
4,059 posts, read 5,619,531 times
Reputation: 2892
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post
A 3-5% sales tax would be viewed as amusingly low by tourist and likely outrageous by residents.
Not to mention that any tax system (or any system at all) comes with overhead costs.

In terms of administrative overhead it would cost both business and gov't the same amount to operate a sales tax system at 3% as it would at 8%. Though the unspoken advantage of overhead is that it creates jobs, and jobs are generally regarded as a good thing.

Efficiency and efficacy don't always go hand in hand and are sometimes at odds. But in regards to a system of taxation, a system with a low rate probably is likely to be a drag - some leaning towards efficiency strikes me as desirable in a tax system.

And sales tax really isn't all that efficient for small local businesses in particular, though the national chains could likely implement it pretty easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 01:32 AM
 
Location: Houston
1,257 posts, read 2,653,547 times
Reputation: 1236
Quote:
Originally Posted by bler144 View Post
Not to mention that any tax system (or any system at all) comes with overhead costs.

In terms of administrative overhead it would cost both business and gov't the same amount to operate a sales tax system at 3% as it would at 8%. Though the unspoken advantage of overhead is that it creates jobs, and jobs are generally regarded as a good thing.

Efficiency and efficacy don't always go hand in hand and are sometimes at odds. But in regards to a system of taxation, a system with a low rate probably is likely to be a drag - some leaning towards efficiency strikes me as desirable in a tax system.

And sales tax really isn't all that efficient for small local businesses in particular, though the national chains could likely implement it pretty easily.
I think there are plenty of examples out there on how to administer a sales tax. I flinched when the bureaucracy needed to manage the taxation was mentioned. A statewide 6.25 with local jurisdictions taking additional 2% is all the incentive needed to get state and counties on board. My biggest pro for sales tax is it gets a piece of the gray money flying around. With people working cash jobs or unreported income the money gets taxed at the state/county level. Income taxes miss this every time.

I was in Mississippi couple years back and they have the triple threat. Property, income and sales tax. Even food was taxed. Property taxes are low. Sales tax was 7% (higher in some places). Income tax maxes out at 5%.

While not what I currently enjoy you get to pick your pain somewhat.

A tax overhaul is unlikely in Oregon anytime soon. We can dream.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,930,564 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squidlo View Post
I think there are plenty of examples out there on how to administer a sales tax. I flinched when the bureaucracy needed to manage the taxation was mentioned. A statewide 6.25 with local jurisdictions taking additional 2% is all the incentive needed to get state and counties on board. My biggest pro for sales tax is it gets a piece of the gray money flying around. With people working cash jobs or unreported income the money gets taxed at the state/county level. Income taxes miss this every time.
And what is also missed is that if you added up ALL the "gray money" that might be missed by an income tax only structure, it would not equal the tax breaks given to just one of the several Fortune 500's incorporated in Oregon! The forest is missed for the trees every time. Wage earners in the $20K/yr income category are hounded to death to pay back taxes of hundreds of dollars. Penalties and interest see to it that The Man will profit to the tune of thousands on the backs of these unfortunates. High wage earners pay cents on the dollar on their back taxes and their penalties are waived. And the really big guys don't pay taxes commensurate with their profits in the first place. The "losses" are incredible.

I wouldn't know how to game a sales tax system but I bet there are people who know how. Lots in fact. Do you really want to give unscrupulous retailers a mandate to rob you? In the name of going after some "gray money"? I believe NYC tops rankings of tax misery by a wide margin for having sales, income and property taxes equal to highest of any other state in the country, most of whom only have one or two of these revenue streams and none with all three into double digits. And the infrastructure is still sub-par, the schools, sub-par, environmental quality, sub-par... ... everytime the topic here turns to taxes I have to ask myself anew... what am I missing??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2014, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Sylmar, a part of Los Angeles
8,342 posts, read 6,428,879 times
Reputation: 17463
Al Sharpton owes millions in back taxes and nothing happens to him, Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2015, 12:58 AM
 
Location: Houston
1,257 posts, read 2,653,547 times
Reputation: 1236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
And what is also missed is that if you added up ALL the "gray money" that might be missed by an income tax only structure, it would not equal the tax breaks given to just one of the several Fortune 500's incorporated in Oregon! The forest is missed for the trees every time. Wage earners in the $20K/yr income category are hounded to death to pay back taxes of hundreds of dollars. Penalties and interest see to it that The Man will profit to the tune of thousands on the backs of these unfortunates. High wage earners pay cents on the dollar on their back taxes and their penalties are waived. And the really big guys don't pay taxes commensurate with their profits in the first place. The "losses" are incredible.

I wouldn't know how to game a sales tax system but I bet there are people who know how. Lots in fact. Do you really want to give unscrupulous retailers a mandate to rob you? In the name of going after some "gray money"? I believe NYC tops rankings of tax misery by a wide margin for having sales, income and property taxes equal to highest of any other state in the country, most of whom only have one or two of these revenue streams and none with all three into double digits. And the infrastructure is still sub-par, the schools, sub-par, environmental quality, sub-par... ... everytime the topic here turns to taxes I have to ask myself anew... what am I missing??!!
I never said no taxes for the wealthy. I said fair taxes. I am far from wealthy. Seems to me that in obsessing over the wealth of a few, we forget that even the least of us owes something to the community. Land of the free doesn't mean everything should be free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2015, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
Oregon has a pretty low tax rate for everybody. Yes, Texas takes a lower bite out of Texans, but we pay 4.6% of every barrel of oil produced so Texans can run around rich.

We have no state sales tax and no state property tax, and even poor people get their standard deduction tax free before income taxes even start to kick in. The only people who gripe about Oregon income taxes are pretty well to do. Oregon treats capital gains as ordinary income that is taxed at income tax rates. Thanks to a logging project, Oregon's income tax was really painful in 2013 because it pushed us into the top tax bracket, but that was a one shot thing. Our future income will be more modest. Treating capital gains as income is only sensible, though. It's hard to understand how the feds justify not lumping capital gains in with all other forms of income. Being rich has privileges, I guess, at least on the national level if not in Oregon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top