Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Orlando
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-09-2009, 08:11 AM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,020,627 times
Reputation: 13166

Advertisements

That only accounts for about 30% of tourists. What about the rest of them who stay onsite at Disney, in the Disney area, on Kissimmee, LBV, and in private rental homes? Additionally they don't want to schlepp luggage. Mom, dad, and two kids each with a large suitcase are not going to take light rail to a hotel.

And to be honest, as someone who used to do a LOT of business travel and attend a lot of conferences, even with the availability of light rail, most business travelers will take a cab or car service. I generally prefered light rail when I traveled for business where it was available, but I was the very, very rare person who did--and I am also a very light packer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2009, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Orange County, Florida
385 posts, read 1,403,092 times
Reputation: 199
My knee-jerk reaction is to support any kind of public transit, but I don't think the area is ready for Sunrail. To be economical, a rail system has to have a LOT of users, enough to keep a lot of trains running all the time. Under those conditions rail has by far the highest carrying capacity and economy of any system. But for that to happen, the people being serviced have to use the system. A rail system that is not running a lot of trains wastes the money it costs to build the system in the first place (even using existing tracks you have to build stations, etc). A rail system that is not filling the trains that are running wastes operating expenses.

I agree that using the money that is being spent on Sunrail would be better spent on Lynx. Before you can jump to rail you need a population that considers public transportation to be a viable choice. Many of the very people who would most benefit from public transit cannot use it because of the hours and areas it is available The most economical way to expand the service area and service level of public transport is to expand the bus system. Even in large cities like New York, London, and Tokyo, where the rail network is decades ahead of us in it's service area, level, and the percentage of people who actually use it, buses are still a vital means of transporting people both directly to destinations and to and from the rail network.

In rail-happy Japan the city of Kyoto, which is very roughly in the same population size class as Orange County, uses buses as it main means of transportation, despite having a population density a little over twice Orange County's (higher population densities benefit rail). And while Kyoto does have a small rail network, it also has a population that has been accustomed to using public transit for decades and which keeps that rail network running with a high level of usage.

In addition to this, LYNX has to serve not just Orange County but surrounding areas as well, some of which currently have VERY little service. Buses are the only option to serve such a large, low population density area. It is foolish to consider rail when bus service is in such a poor state; it is like building a house without building the foundation first. Rail service is not an alternative to bus service, it complements it. You have to crawl before you can run.

-Harry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 09:22 AM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,559,257 times
Reputation: 5018
well the metro is growing and when I first moved here in 2005 I think Orange county had just surpassed one million residents. The problem is that we also have literally tens of thousands of tourists as well that are just burdening our roadways. There is no doubt that the area will continue to grow and to have a rail option in place now instead of waiting years later when it will become more expensive just makes sense.
When Miami built it's 22 mile elevated Metrorail system in the early 80s the cost of the entire system was roughly $1 billion or what it would cost now just to have Sunrail today. People back then said it was a failure yet today the trains are packed and the system is expanding. You even have smaller cities in the US with light rail & commuter rail already. Orlando is growing up and there needs to be vision in this community in order for it to progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Summerfield FL
518 posts, read 868,570 times
Reputation: 715
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdpop View Post
Sunrail finally passes the senate. Maybe this will lead to more jobs. Railroad jobs tend to pay very well.

Senate passes SunRail, 27-10 -- OrlandoSentinel.com
is that the train that jumps off the tracks occasionally killing people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 11:18 AM
 
Location: America
765 posts, read 2,637,323 times
Reputation: 240
While I agree the bus service needs expansion, it still uses the same gridlocked roads as the cars. The advantage the train has is it is not sitting in gridlock with traffic, like the buses do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
2,168 posts, read 5,051,693 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave w View Post
is that the train that jumps off the tracks occasionally killing people
Because cars never kill people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Orlando - South
4,194 posts, read 11,687,749 times
Reputation: 1674
A lot of people on this forum complain about how orlando needs better mass transit and how sad it is that orlando doesnt even have a rail service. So i think this community needs this and it will benefit us over time. We have a decent bus service, I bet once sunrail is in service lynx will alter their routes in favor of the sunrail stations, so people can take a bus to their nearest station. But even up in the northeastern cities, most people who take a bus from their suburb to their job in the city, usually drive them selves to the nearest station, and rides the train into the city. So that is what people in lake mary, long wood, deltona, etc who work in downtown will probably do. Do you know how many people commute from the northern suburbs of orlando, down I-4 to either downtown or to the attractions area? Thousands of people do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 12:30 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,020,627 times
Reputation: 13166
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdpop View Post
While I agree the bus service needs expansion, it still uses the same gridlocked roads as the cars. The advantage the train has is it is not sitting in gridlock with traffic, like the buses do.
The point is taht if the LYNX system was expanded, more people would use it and as such, get cars off the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 12:43 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,559,257 times
Reputation: 5018
^ I'm not so sure about that! Ever see a LYNX bus on SR 50? They are stuck in the same traffic and the point of Commuter rail is not for intercity travel but to get people who live in far flung suburbs in the north off of I-4 and other highways. What Orlando truly needed was a light rail system but I heard it was shot down over a decacde ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 12:59 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,020,627 times
Reputation: 13166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
^ I'm not so sure about that! Ever see a LYNX bus on SR 50? They are stuck in the same traffic and the point of Commuter rail is not for intercity travel but to get people who live in far flung suburbs in the north off of I-4 and other highways. What Orlando truly needed was a light rail system but I heard it was shot down over a decacde ago.
You are mising my point. If Orange and Seminole County want it, they can pay for it. Instead the entire state is being forced to pay for something that they will never get usage out of.

One of the reasons that LYNX buses are stuck in traffic on 50 is that LYNX doesn't offer adequate service to the western suburbs, which forces the people who live there to drive rather than take the bus.

Anyone who thinks that all the traffic on I-4 is generated by the northern suburbs driving to downtown is incredibly myopic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Orlando
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top