Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He's 68...and is probably doing that "fountain of youth/look at me" thing. She is probably got her sugar daddy. His estate can most likely support the children after his passes on. The kids will lose out on a father/child relationship, more than likely. Or be visiting him in the nursing home.
Other than that...none of anyones business.
And yes, there IS LIFE....after 60. It basically comes down to health, and mechanical/technical difficulties after men reach a certain age. Age related ED. B/P goes up. B/P meds many times cause ED. That is where the ED meds come in.
Ronny wood is 68, his wife is 37, they are expecting twins.......... I mean WTF ... what is it with these old ass guys having babies... I mean this guy is gonna be a corpse in a few yrs and yet he's bringing babies into the world... isn't this the epitome of self centered egoistical garbage... I mean kids need their dads, they need their moms, they need both... why the hell do these old bastards keep having kids when they shouldn't even be buying ripe bananas???????
I think its interesting that the OP condemns the father, but treats mom like she's a potted plant, as though she had nothing to do with the decision to have children. The OP reveals her hatred of men, and a lot less about her concern for the children. Yes, we all know the children might have less than the ideal home-life, but lots, maybe even most have less than an ideal home-life. Mom being a single mom, having children from several different men is far from ideal also.
But condemnation is not justified. People should be free to make these decisions on their own, not have a self proclaimed know it all, or the govt. decide these things. I hope the couple are happy, and the children are loved and cared for like children should be. Just cause dad is 68, doesn't mean he's half dead, and it doesn't mean he can't be an excellent father till they reach adulthood. My FIL lived till 95 and was working and quite active until just a couple of years before he died. Lots of grandparents are raising their grandchildren. We have to ask. What is the OP's real problem.
He's 68...and is probably doing that "fountain of youth/look at me" thing. She is probably got her sugar daddy. His estate can most likely support the children after his passes on. The kids will lose out on a father/child relationship, more than likely. Or be visiting him in the nursing home.
Other than that...none of anyones business.
And yes, there IS LIFE....after 60. It basically comes down to health, and mechanical/technical difficulties after men reach a certain age. Age related ED. B/P goes up. B/P meds many times cause ED. That is where the ED meds come in.
Yep. If you take the "non-feminist" feminist POV, the wife's approach is a business transaction. She gets money and status from breeding with him. She can then afford to hire a manny or two to provide the kids with the semblance of a father figure when he departs the planet.
I think its interesting that the OP condemns the father, but treats mom like she's a potted plant, as though she had nothing to do with the decision to have children. The OP reveals her hatred of men, and a lot less about her concern for the children.
I think I would rail more against all the young guys out there who go around procreating and being "baby daddies" never to financially support or be a viable part of the lives of the children they create. Lots of those out there. At least Ronnie can well support his.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.